On FX, my fave midrange lens is the 60G

Discussion in 'Lens Lust' started by Uncle Frank, Jun 6, 2011.

  1. I've been shooting full frame for more than 2 years, and have auditioned a variety of midrange lenses. The lens that has pleased me the most, based on my personal interests and style, is the 60/2.8G. It's too short for the hard core macro shooters, and too slow for the folks who want to obliterate backgrounds, but I find it excellent for flowers, product photography, and events like house parties. Our neighbors celebrated their son's graduation from grammar school this weekend. I didn't want to overwhelm their family gathering with a big rig, so my kit consisted of the d700, 60/2.8G, and sb400. It's a very competent lightweight kit, provided you have the option of moving your feet to select complementary backgrounds and to frame the compositions.

    d700 + 60/2.8G @ f/3.5 1/100 iso200
    DSC7270-ed-XL.

    d700 + 60/2.8G @ f/3.5 1/320 iso200
    DSC7254-ed-XL.

    d700 + 60/2.8G @ f/3.5 1/100 iso3200
    DSC7257-ed-XL.

    d700 + 60/2.8G @ f/3.5 1/60 iso380 with flash
    DSC7269-ed-XL.

    d700 + 60/2.8G @ f/3.5 1/60 iso200 with flash
    DSC7262-ed-XL.
     
  2. Ronald M

    Ronald M

    Nov 10, 2008
    Chicago
    I think of mine as a close focus 50, or a nice general lens.

    35 60 105 G`s are a viable set up I use for landscape/nature.
    In fact one bag is set up for that.

    24 2.8 AFD, 35 1.8 G 60 2.8 G make a nice DX set. Try the 60 on DX for macro/portraits if you have DX. Another bag is set up for that also.
     
  3. StIves

    StIves

    728
    Nov 16, 2009
    travel
    I don't know if it is my favorite but I liked it better than the 105 VR. I don't use it as macro but I appreciate the ability to focus as close as I would ever want very useful, something the 50G and 85G lack greatly.

    children in particular are great subjects for this lens. the price doesn't hurt.
     
  4. Wonderful images UF, I just picked up the 60G, I'll have to use it a bit more.....
    Thanks for sharing,
    Jon
     
  5. Samer

    Samer

    527
    Sep 19, 2006
    Jupiter, FL
    Thanks for sharing these. There is another thread asking about the use of the 60 2.8 for portraits, and I think this shows a good example of that.

    IMO, the last shot is a great example of what you can do with this lens on FX. Nothing wrong with the shot at all. However...

    In image #2, the bokeh is not my cup of tea and this is consistent with what I've seen from that lens in similar situations elsewhere (I haven't used the lens myself). I think it is a representative shot. For those who don't mind it, then this lens is fine.

    In image #4, the nose is getting a bit big. For FX, seems like 60mm might be a bit too short for this type of headshot IMO.

    Cheers,
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.