/ Register

playing with color space with D2h

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by Keith, Feb 4, 2005.

  1. Keith

    Keith

    3,423
    Jan 29, 2005
    Edmonton, Alberta
    I have only had the D2h for less than a week. When loading pics on pbase with my D100 or D1x sRGB had more punch and looked much better. Im finding with the D2h that adobe work space looks much better as the sRGB looks way over saturated. :? What do you guys find?? I had to change my workflow, less processing :D ...........just did my comparisons, stupid me I already deleted them off pbase, I should have shown them here for you to see for yourself. Here is a pic, posted in adobe.........only 2 outings with D2h but Im starting to really like it!!

    Also another note for pbase, if I make any pictures above 800pix, it compresses it, sized 3 times and anything 800pix or below looked great. If I sized to 800 and framed it, making it bigger again I lost good detail. So key is 800max or below. Interested in your thoughts.

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
    Keith, Feb 4, 2005
    #1
  2. Retief

    Retief Subscribing Member

    14,731
    Jan 26, 2005
    Marysville, WA
    I have had my D2H since January, 2003 and have always shot in AdobeRGB and converted to sRGB for the web. Just a normal part of my workflow. I'd like to see that comparison, if I wasn't tired tonight I'd do it myself. As I recall, I have seen some of my stuff look rather "muddy" when posted in Adobe.....but I will have to check. I'll bet you can get a comparison up before I can... :wink:
     
    Retief, Feb 4, 2005
    #2
  3. Flew

    Flew

    994
    Jan 25, 2005
    Alabama
    Keith,

    First let me say awesome shots!! On the 800 pixel issue, there was an earlier thread that mentioned this same problem, and in a response, someone said that you can force pbase to feed the original. I'm a smugmug user, and I know how to do that on my pics, but I don't know the details for pbase.

    Maybe someone that knows the procedure can assist. In the earlier example, the difference was significant.

    Regards,

    Frank
     
    Flew, Feb 4, 2005
    #3
  4. Keith

    Keith

    3,423
    Jan 29, 2005
    Edmonton, Alberta
    Thanks Frank, will see if someone comes to the rescue. :wink:
     
    Keith, Feb 4, 2005
    #4
  5. greyflash

    greyflash

    30,031
    Jan 29, 2005
    St. George, Utah
    Keith, look back at posts by Yves, he indicated how to force the original to be linked to this and other sites.
     
    greyflash, Feb 4, 2005
    #5
  6. Keith

    Keith

    3,423
    Jan 29, 2005
    Edmonton, Alberta
    How far back. LOL...............tried a week back but to no avail ???
     
    Keith, Feb 4, 2005
    #6
  7. mike mac

    mike mac

    12,409
    Jan 25, 2005
    East Norriton, PA
    I use Adobe RGB for web posting

    I have found that with the D2H I post all my pics in adobe RGB colorspace, I dont see a huge difference between srgb and adobe rgb. Look forward to your comparisons.
     
    mike mac, Feb 4, 2005
    #7
  8. Keith

    Keith

    3,423
    Jan 29, 2005
    Edmonton, Alberta
    Here we go with the comparison!!!

    Much more saturation than on the adobe


    Adobe

    [​IMG]

    sRGB

    [​IMG]

    I dont know about you, but I do see a big difference..........
    Mike, did you carry the same flow with the D100. With my D100 i always posted in sRGB as i found it was flat otherwise........

    well interested in your thoughts[/img]
     
    Keith, Feb 4, 2005
    #8
Loading...
Similar Threads Forum Date
Need quick opinions - color of web site General Discussion Apr 9, 2017
Learn to Play Bridge (Card Game) iPad App Recs? General Discussion Mar 4, 2017
Play ball! 40 years behind the pitch as a Sports Illustrated photographer General Discussion Feb 28, 2015
Who said that kids don't play outside anymore? General Discussion May 28, 2014
Learn to play a musical intrument late in life? General Discussion Feb 25, 2014
  • mpb.com