1. Welcome to NikonCafe.com—a friendly Nikon camera & photography discussion forum!

    If you are thinking of buying a camera or need help with your photos, you will find our forum members full of advice! Click here to join for free!

Puzzled by ISO performance

Discussion in 'Nikon FX DSLR Forum' started by jamesd3rd, Aug 1, 2009.

  1. jamesd3rd

    jamesd3rd

    399
    May 4, 2007
    So. Cal
    I tried out my newly purchased 24-70 yesterday in a room where are retirement party was being thrown. The room was lit by recessed lighting and had a window that spanned the entire width of the room with vertical blinds pretty much closed. Even though the blinds were closed, the 2:00 sun was enough to light the room fairly well for people to see but would have been considered dim for a camera I would imagine.

    I was playing around with the ISO and cranked it up to 2500 to see what the results would be. I was surprised that at f/2.8 in Aperture Priority I was getting shutter speeds as slow as 1/50. I would have thought that it would have been quite a bit faster or am I missing something?
     
  2. pforsell

    pforsell

    Jan 15, 2008
    Hi,
    the way you describe the lighting I think your results are as expected. The shutter, aperture and ISO combination give lighting value of LV 4. This falls in the category of approximately "typical candle light" and just below "typical indoor lighting".

    See the second table from the top:
    http://www.earthboundlight.com/phototips/exposure-stops-here.html

    If your camera was pointing at a dark suit or similar at the time you checked the shutter speed, that would have given you a stop or even two slower shutter speed, than a gray suit or dress.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 1, 2009
  3. Julien

    Julien

    Jul 28, 2006
    Paris, France
    It also depends on what metering you chose.
     
  4. Wrxified

    Wrxified

    172
    Mar 10, 2008
    Michigan
    It sounds like you're shooting in aperture priority mode with auto ISO turned off. Seems like if you're limiting the ISO to 2500 and setting the aperture to 2.8, the camera's high ISO performance is not going to have anything to do with the shutter speed it expects to see for a specific EV.

    I would've bumped up the ISO.
     
  5. jamesd3rd

    jamesd3rd

    399
    May 4, 2007
    So. Cal
    Yeah I was thinking about that later and wondered what the ISO would have been if I had set it to Auto.
     
  6. MrSLR

    MrSLR

    Jan 13, 2009
    Pennsylvania
    Dont be afraid to go past 3200 iso, heck even 6400 looks amazing in most cases.

    ISO 5000 is usually where i live.
     
  7. Wrxified

    Wrxified

    172
    Mar 10, 2008
    Michigan
    Most likely if you were sitting there with a D300 and locked it in at 2500 ISO, f2.8 the EV would've calculated 1/50 shutter speed as well. The difference would be the d300 and the noise coming through. If it came back with a shutter speed that was drastically different I'd be worried that one of them was having issues.
     
  8. panda81

    panda81

    Feb 7, 2008
    Texas
    I agree with the others, it sounds about right based by what you were saying. Aperture f/2.8 really isn't that wide when you're in low light. I usually use up to ISO 6400 on my D700, so don't be afraid to try it.

    For example, I'm pretty certain this photo was around ISO 6400 (or maybe 5000, something pretty high)

    3747660537_b36937a6d5_o.jpg
    Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


    Take advantage of the ridiculously low noise at high ISO...:smile:
     
  9. goffer

    goffer

    Nov 22, 2007
    San Diego
    James, were you using matrix metering or spot? Also like the other said, dont be afraid of 3200/6400 :) 
     
  10. jamesd3rd

    jamesd3rd

    399
    May 4, 2007
    So. Cal
    I bounced around. Sometimes used matrix, sometimes center-weighted, sometimes spot. If I took a picture of someone near the window where they were severely backlit, I used spot. For other parts of the room I switched it up. I would have to look at the meta-data to get an accurate breakdown.
     
  11. qksilver

    qksilver

    25
    Jul 29, 2009
    Northern VA
    I agree with others, I wouldnt be afraid to go above 2500, 3200 would have given you a little more speed and 6400 would have given you over 1/100th

    adding a tungsten gelled flash and bouncing it off the ceiling would have helped add some light to the room as well.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.