Question about macro "micro"

Joined
Feb 6, 2006
Messages
19,943
Location
TX originally from Louisiana
Well, I hope this is a good place to post this - What is the difference between the kenko extension tube set and the canon 500 d diopter ring thingies? I'm wanting to do better with flowers and I'm not ready to buy another lens just yet. Any help will be appreciated!
 
Joined
Jan 16, 2006
Messages
420
Location
CA
I am no expert on these things so hopefully someone else will chime in with more complete information - but here goes.

Extension tubes move the lens further from the camera (it sits between the camer and the body). The Canon 500d is like a magnifying glass on the front of your lens. The intended result of both is similar. The former is probably "better" as you are not adding another pane of glass in front of your lens, while the latter is probably more convenient as it just screws on like a filter.
 
Joined
Feb 6, 2006
Messages
19,943
Location
TX originally from Louisiana
I am no expert on these things so hopefully someone else will chime in with more complete information - but here goes.

Extension tubes move the lens further from the camera (it sits between the camer and the body). The Canon 500d is like a magnifying glass on the front of your lens. The intended result of both is similar. The former is probably "better" as you are not adding another pane of glass in front of your lens, while the latter is probably more convenient as it just screws on like a filter.
Thanks! It was after I posted this that I found some threads where the kenkos were used with the 50mm f1.8 lens. I have the lens and if I can achieve what the other people did, then I may very well go with the kenkos. I'm just not sure I'm wanting to spend more $$ on more lenses! I've bought 2 this year already.
 
Joined
Feb 6, 2006
Messages
19,943
Location
TX originally from Louisiana
I use the Canon 500D close-up lens together with the 18-200mm VR, I am quite happy with the results. Here you can find some photos taken with this combination www.flickr.com/photos/roosjeh/tags/500d/show/
WOW! Talk about awsome! WOW! This is gonna be tough deciding between the kenko tubes and the canon 500D. I have both the lenses ya'll used these things with, so I guess it's gonna be a toss up or comparing prices. I'm totally impressed! Thanks!!!!
 
L

Logan

Guest
for the cost of a full set of AF kenkos, Dianne, you could always just splurge for a 60 micro (just trying to give you incentive to buy! Lol) sorry i dont have more time or else i would comment on the choices you aregoing between, i have seen wonderful from both and idont think you could really go "wrong" myself, given this decision, i would get the tubes. I do not have them but the research i have done, when the money avails i will get the tubes. they can also be used in other lenses to get just a little better close focusing distance, but they wont focus to infinity, remember. i really dont know too much about either.
 
Joined
Mar 31, 2005
Messages
14,469
Location
Toronto Canada
Dianne, can you shoot fully manual? I have a no-name set of extension tubes with no contacts therefore you'd have to shoot fully manual mode. Can let them go really cheap... I didn't realize they were for manual only, and I can't do manual focusing. I had to get the Kenko set for AF, but love shooting with tubes!
 
Joined
Feb 6, 2006
Messages
19,943
Location
TX originally from Louisiana
Dianne, can you shoot fully manual? I have a no-name set of extension tubes with no contacts therefore you'd have to shoot fully manual mode. Can let them go really cheap... I didn't realize they were for manual only, and I can't do manual focusing. I had to get the Kenko set for AF, but love shooting with tubes!
Hiya! No, I haven't tried manual yet and with my eyesight, dunno if I can! I'm so excited over the responses I'm getting - I'm wondering about getting both the kenkos and the canon 500d. Gotta compare prices too! Wow, thanks for the offer! :biggrin:
 
Joined
Jun 3, 2005
Messages
1,961
Location
CT
I have not used tubes or the canon.. but being kind of a macro nut.. and love shooting flowers.. I would have to go for the true macro lens.. you can not go wrong with any of the true fixed length macros that are out there.. if you spend your money on tubes and the 500 you can almost have a true macro lens..I know this is no help.. but get the lens.. your the Ceo right???
 
Joined
May 3, 2005
Messages
3,925
Location
Owings Mills, MD
Check out Scott Schexnaydre's macro posts using 300F4 and tubes!!

Hi Dianne,

I going to add my three cents too!! :biggrin: I highly recommend the 60mm micro lens when you are ready for your first macro lens. But, in the meantime, Scott Schexnaydre (aka SSchex) uses his 300 mm F4 (sometimes in combination with extension tubes) to capture incredible images of insects, especially butterflies. Scott also has a pBase site (I check it out on a regular basis):

http://www.pbase.com/sschex/butterflies

Here are a couple of threads posted by Scott:

https://www.nikoncafe.com/vforums/showthread.php?t=105630
https://www.nikoncafe.com/vforums/showthread.php?t=89597
https://www.nikoncafe.com/vforums/showthread.php?t=89403
https://www.nikoncafe.com/vforums/showthread.php?t=89103

His work is really amazing, and he's a birder too!! Enjoy!!

Oops, I am so silly, :redface: :tongue: :redface: I have loads of examples from four of the micro Nikkor lenses (60, 70-180, 105, and 200) on my pBase site. Feel free to browse around. I haven't add anything new this year...but everything is budding and I am getting ready!!

I've only used my 500D in combination with the 70-200VR. Here is the link to the day we discovered the yellow jacket next inside a throw rug on my deck: http://www.pbase.com/cympearson/yellowjackets
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Joined
Feb 6, 2006
Messages
19,943
Location
TX originally from Louisiana
Hi Dianne,

I going to add my three cents too!! :biggrin: I highly recommend the 60mm micro lens when you are ready for your first macro lens. But, in the meantime, Scott Schexnaydre (akak SSchex) uses his 300 mm F4 (sometimes in combination with extension tubes) to capture incredible images of insects, especially butterflies. Scott also has a pBase site (I check it out on a regular basis):

http://www.pbase.com/sschex/butterflies

Here are a couple of threads posted by Scott:

https://www.nikoncafe.com/vforums/showthread.php?t=105630
https://www.nikoncafe.com/vforums/showthread.php?t=89597
https://www.nikoncafe.com/vforums/showthread.php?t=89403
https://www.nikoncafe.com/vforums/showthread.php?t=89103

His work is really amazing, and he's a birder too!! Enjoy!!
Thanks, Crystall! I'm gonna be borrowing some extension tubes to play with and see how I like them. I've also heard about a 105mm lens that may be up for sale.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Joined
Apr 12, 2006
Messages
11,956
Location
Central Georgia, USA
As for the 60MM micro, I would not recommend it, it is fine for flowers, and is a good lens. If you are shooting bugs and such you will scare them. I regret buying my 60 and wish I had at least got the 105 or something longer. as a result, I use my 70/200 with tubes, and sometimes do some trap shooting with the setup.
 
Joined
Feb 6, 2006
Messages
19,943
Location
TX originally from Louisiana
As for the 60MM micro, I would not recommend it, it is fine for flowers, and is a good lens. If you are shooting bugs and such you will scare them. I regret buying my 60 and wish I had at least got the 105 or something longer. as a result, I use my 70/200 with tubes, and sometimes do some trap shooting with the setup.
Thanks for the info! At this point, bugs aren't in my plans.
 
Joined
Nov 17, 2006
Messages
1,456
Location
Lakeland FL
I have a Nikon 60 and Sigma 105. I just bought a set of Kenko tubes from our site. They work super well with the 50 1.8.
Now if you were going to Huntsville I could let you borrow one.....
 
Joined
Feb 6, 2006
Messages
19,943
Location
TX originally from Louisiana
I have a Nikon 60 and Sigma 105. I just bought a set of Kenko tubes from our site. They work super well with the 50 1.8.
Now if you were going to Huntsville I could let you borrow one.....
Geee, thanks for the offer! I'm very upset that we can't go this year. THe kids are in school and Mark may have to work overtime. I'm actually getting to borrow a set of the tubes from another cafe member. I'm excited about getting to try them out! I hope you have a very safe and perfectly wonderful trip! Eat a smore for me!
 
Joined
Jul 15, 2005
Messages
602
Location
Beacon Falls CT (USA)
Dianne,
Can't speak about tubes but the D500 limits the distance you can shot at, it can only focus to a limited distance after that it is blurry where a macro lens can be used an distance.
I got the canon 500D for my 18-200VR for vacation use and it worked well but if I wanted to take shots from over 12" of so they was blurry. With my 60mm I can work with the lens at any distance, not a big deal when you don't want to shoot macro just take the 500 off.
Rich
 
Joined
Feb 6, 2006
Messages
19,943
Location
TX originally from Louisiana
Dianne,
Can't speak about tubes but the D500 limits the distance you can shot at, it can only focus to a limited distance after that it is blurry where a macro lens can be used an distance.
I got the canon 500D for my 18-200VR for vacation use and it worked well but if I wanted to take shots from over 12" of so they was blurry. With my 60mm I can work with the lens at any distance, not a big deal when you don't want to shoot macro just take the 500 off.
Rich
Thanks for the info! At this point, I'm having fun exploring all my options! I thought about the 500D for vacation too, as the VR lens is the only lens I'll be taking with me on motorcycle trips. I'll be exploring more!
 
Joined
Jul 29, 2005
Messages
9,532
Location
Pittsburgh, Pa.
I own the 18-200 VR and Canon 500d

I also own the 105 f/2.8 Micro VR

The 18-200/500d combo does a good job and is a great set for travel and vacations. The wide range and micro ability is very versitile. Close up shots can be made without a tripod.

The 105 Micro VR is outstanding and noticeably better than the 500d, but at less than 3 ft you still need a tripod.

I've never used extension tubes.

Greg
 
Joined
Feb 6, 2006
Messages
19,943
Location
TX originally from Louisiana
I own the 18-200 VR and Canon 500d

I also own the 105 f/2.8 Micro VR

The 18-200/500d combo does a good job and is a great set for travel and vacations. The wide range and micro ability is very versitile. Close up shots can be made without a tripod.

The 105 Micro VR is outstanding and noticeably better than the 500d, but at less than 3 ft you still need a tripod.

I've never used extension tubes.

Greg

Thanks Greg! I have a feeling my wishlist will start to grow again!
 

Latest posts

Links on this page may be to our affiliates. Sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
Nikon Cafe is a fan site and not associated with Nikon Corporation.
Forum post reactions by Twemoji: https://github.com/twitter/twemoji
Copyright © 2005-2019 Amin Forums, LLC
Top Bottom