Question on extension tubes

Discussion in 'Macro, Flowers, Insects, and Greenery' started by Allan, May 31, 2007.

  1. Allan

    Allan

    Apr 21, 2006
    Nashua, NH
    I have no photo(s) to post but thought this might be the place to ask.

    I have a 105 non-vr micro. I want to get farther away from my subject so a 200 micro would be a good choice. However, I have a 70-200 vr zoom and can easily borrow extension tubes.

    Would the zoom and extension tubes be an acceptable substitute?

    Is there a chart that would show the focusing range at 200 for various Kenko extension tubes?

    What would be disadvantages aside from the inconvenience of switching tubes and having a limited focus range?
     
  2. The 70-200VR works very well with diopters such as the Canon 500D.

    Extension tubes take away too much light. Also, I don't know if there are extension tubes that communicate AF and VR between lens and camera.

    Cheers
     
  3. Allan

    Allan

    Apr 21, 2006
    Nashua, NH
    Kenko tubes do AF but I am guessing not vr. Thanks for the information.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.