Question: What primes do sport photographers use?

Joined
Apr 4, 2008
Messages
333
Location
Spartanburg, SC
What prime lenses do sport photographers use? I am looking into purchasing one for use with baseball and softball with the occasional indoor volleyball. Any suggestions and recommendations?

Thanks,
Trent
 
Joined
Mar 3, 2008
Messages
1,922
Location
Northeast, CT
In a way it does now depend on the camera but a great start would be the 300 f2.8

Indoors is a whole new ball game, but the 85 1.8 would be a good start as well, although the 200 f2 is great indoors.
 
Joined
Apr 11, 2007
Messages
10,664
Location
Holyoke, MA USA
Outdoors: 300 f/2.8.

Indoors: 50 f/1.4 and 85 f/1.4
Ditto Gary on these three except my 85 is an f/1.8. And add the 35 f/2 for basketball right under the backstop.

I'd also have a 200 f/2 if I could afford them, and maybe a 135 f/2.

The 300 works will with a 1.4x telextender, but if money were no object I'd add a 400 f/2.8 to the list.

All these using the D300 and the D1H.
 
Joined
Nov 15, 2007
Messages
122
Location
S. Florida
I use the 300 2.8 afs also, it is a very fast and sharp lens. It is great for baseball and softball, especially in those poor lit fields at night. For basketball, it might be a little long. My main lens for basketball is the 70-200 2.8, but I have fee reins to move around at out high school gym. I also switch with the 24-70 2.8 for a wider view.
 
Joined
Apr 4, 2008
Messages
333
Location
Spartanburg, SC
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #9
The 300 f/2.8 is out of the question money wise. But the 300 f/4 is within my limits. Any comments on this lens?
 
Joined
Mar 3, 2008
Messages
1,922
Location
Northeast, CT
The 300 f/2.8 is out of the question money wise. But the 300 f/4 is within my limits. Any comments on this lens?
Best starter lens for outdoor sports as long as you have the light to work with. Once light starts heading south time to pack up. Indoors you'll want 2.8 or faster, many like to use the 1.4-1.8 lenses.

If you can swing it go for the Sigma 120-300 many photogs on here use it and have been very happy with it.
 
Joined
Apr 4, 2008
Messages
333
Location
Spartanburg, SC
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #11
The 120-300 f/2.8 is a little out of the question money wise right now too. I'm purchasing the Sigma 70-200 f/2.8 and am thinking about buying a TC to go with it. Then I am looking into buying a nice prime lens. I might just go for the 85 f/1.8 or something.
 
Joined
Feb 28, 2006
Messages
3,047
Location
Green Bay, WI
Outdoors = 300 f2.8 +/- 1.4 TC.... 600 f4 is next on my wish list.... *sigh*

Indoors:
50 f1.4
85 f 1.8
85 f 1.2
135 f2.....my personal favorite.

Oh....mine aren't Nikon ones though. Do they still count?
 
Joined
Aug 14, 2007
Messages
2,441
Location
Western Suburb of Cleveland, Ohio.
I have the 300/f4 too. I like it a lot. It's my favorite lens of my very small collection of lenses. Focuses fast and is sharp. Works fine with a 1.4 TC as well.

It was a great addition to my kit. You can get them used for $850 give or take.

As others have said though, when the light goes down, a 2.8 would sure be nice. I'm thinking of selling the f4 to put towards a 300 2.8 AF-S.

The 300/f4 seems to come up for sale somewhat regularly on the For Sale board. Not so the 2.8 AF-S it seems.

I don't do anything sports-wise indoors. Although last winter I tried using my 50 1.4 at a couple HS basketball games. It focuses waaaaayyyy too slow though. :frown:

Joe
 
Joined
Mar 25, 2005
Messages
12,515
Location
near Montreal, Canada
I agree that a 300mm lens is optimal for most sports - especially field sports and swimming.
An f/2.8 version is awesome but the f/4 version will do fine if light is sufficient.

I will be shooting the yearly Interclub competition at my golf course this Sunday and I expect that the 300mm will be used most.
I will definitely be hauling my 400/2.8 as well and I always get nice up close shots with the 200/2.0 also.

It'll be fun again :smile:
 
Joined
Mar 14, 2006
Messages
1,998
Location
New Jersey
400/2.8 plus I use a 1.4x tele on occasion
Baseball, Softball, Lacrosse, Soccer, Football, Field Hockey, ice hockey

300/2.8
Volleyball, Swimming, Basketball

I also have an 85/1.2 and 35/1.4 but do not use it for basketball or volleyball. All the best primes in the world will only get you good shots inside poorly lit venues. If you want to be able to get some awesome shots indoors that will look as good on the web as a huge billboard, you are better of investing in some strobes to simulate arena lighting. If you are shooting primarily inside very well lit arenas then just get one of the new bodies and crank up the ISO.
 
Joined
Mar 14, 2006
Messages
1,998
Location
New Jersey
.... 600 f4 is next on my wish list.... *sigh*

Oh....mine aren't Nikon ones though. Do they still count?
Oh just get the 400/2.8 first. With your 1.4x tele you almost have the same reach. Or go ahead and get the 600/4 then send it to me so I can field test it for you. I'll be real thorough. Maybe 2 years worth of testing. :cool:

Mine aren't Nikon either so they should count as a double.
 
Joined
Feb 28, 2006
Messages
3,047
Location
Green Bay, WI
I also have an 85/1.2 and 35/1.4 but do not use it for basketball or volleyball. All the best primes in the world will only get you good shots inside poorly lit venues. If you want to be able to get some awesome shots indoors that will look as good on the web as a huge billboard, you are better of investing in some strobes to simulate arena lighting. If you are shooting primarily inside very well lit arenas then just get one of the new bodies and crank up the ISO.
I wish I could strobe the gymnastics events....can't, so it's all about wide open primes for now :(

Oh just get the 400/2.8 first. With your 1.4x tele you almost have the same reach. Or go ahead and get the 600/4 then send it to me so I can field test it for you. I'll be real thorough. Maybe 2 years worth of testing. :cool:

Mine aren't Nikon either so they should count as a double.
:tongue: Yes, I thought about the 400 f2.8, but the 300 with the 1.4 is a 400 f 4.....seems too close. The 600 f4 is on my list only because EAA Airventure is coming up... I have no real reason other than that to even think about dragging that lens around.
 
Joined
Mar 14, 2006
Messages
1,998
Location
New Jersey
:tongue: Yes, I thought about the 400 f2.8, but the 300 with the 1.4 is a 400 f 4.....seems too close. The 600 f4 is on my list only because EAA Airventure is coming up... I have no real reason other than that to even think about dragging that lens around.
a 400/2.8 + 1.4 tele = 560/4. That's close enough. But if you really need the 600/4 for only a single event. You may as well just rent it. A 600/4 with a 1.4 tele would be real nice for the air show.
 

Latest posts

Links on this page may be to our affiliates. Sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
Nikon Cafe is a fan site and not associated with Nikon Corporation.
Forum post reactions by Twemoji: https://github.com/twitter/twemoji
Copyright © 2005-2019 Amin Forums, LLC
Top Bottom