Quick question about AIS wides

Discussion in 'Lens Lust' started by nancyr, Jun 1, 2007.

  1. nancyr

    nancyr

    Feb 14, 2006
    La Jolla, CA
    My 24/2 and 28/2 AIS both have more play in focus than my other AIS lenses (50/1.4, 135/2, 200/2, all bought used). I can live with it, but if they could be as smooth as the 50, I'd be a very happy shooter.

    Is this due to age/use, or is it more typical of the wides? Would a CLA fix it, or are they just worn? We have a great repair shop here in SD (Kurt's in El Cajon), but I don't want to drive all the way out there for a "that's just old lenses, lady."

    Thanks for helping me be lazy. :redface:
     
  2. debult

    debult

    120
    Jun 11, 2005
    The Netherlands
    My 28 mm /f2 focus is smooth as butter, no play at all.
     
  3. My 24/2, as well as my other Ai(S) lenses, are very smooth Nancy. I also have a dud 50/1.4 with noticeable play in focus - simply because it is old and beat up. It was a "bad experience" from a very active eBay seller of nikon MF lenses :mad:. It has other issues also, so I wrote it off and simply got another one (from Cafe member Andreas): a gem this time.
    CLA may fix it. But if the lens is fine otherwise and the bit of play does not affect the focusing result, I would just live with it.
    Now, about that 200/2 of yours.....:smile:
     
  4. There is no play . . .

    . . . in the focusing mechanism on either of my 28/2s or on my 35/1.4.

    I do have a 50 that's sloppy and one of my 75-150's has a bit of wiggle as well, but the wides (well, normals on the D200 I'm shooting now, but wides on my F4) I have are some of the most perfect feeling (and most enjoyable to use) manual focus primes I own.

    Greg
     
  5. nancyr

    nancyr

    Feb 14, 2006
    La Jolla, CA
    As I thought. I don't notice it much when shooting, and both were bargains, so no sweat. Maybe I pick a fave and "upgrade" sometime.

    Frits, 200 looks like hell, focuses like butta. :wink:

    Thanks, everyone!
     
  6. kjoosten

    kjoosten

    79
    May 1, 2005
    Houston, TX
    I bought an "E" grade 28/2 from KEH and the focus was loose as a goose. Sent it back. That helped to justify the Zeiss 25/2.8. Talk about smooooth...
     
  7. I have two 28/2s . . .

    . . . and both of them are smooth without being loose at all, no play. They feel just about perfect.

    The one KEH sent you probably was a little more used than its exterior looked, or it was just a dud, FWIW.

    Greg
     
  8. nancyr

    nancyr

    Feb 14, 2006
    La Jolla, CA
    I wonder what sellers do and don't check sometimes. My first 24/2 (AI) appeared just fine, as described, good mechanics. But shot wide open, it looked like when the eye doctor tests you for astigmatism. Could've made for some fun bokeh, but I returned it and later found this one.
     
  9. KEH is a quality operation, but they do not check items to the point of using them - there's just too much material for them to do that. They catch all of the obvious stuff, as I've never gotten anything from them other than a focusing screen that was obviously well out of their rating scheme. But subtle things, like a telephoto focusing to 100 feet but not to infinity, a meter that deviates wildly from accurate - but only once in 10 tries, and the like, are just not caught. Fortunately they are very good about making things right if you bring it to their attention.

    I have repeatedly heard less good things about the used operations at both B&H (surprisingly) and Adorama, but so far KEH has given me no reason to buy used gear from another commercial operation.
     
Loading...
Similar Threads Forum Date
Quick question re the 50mm 1.8 and travel Lens Lust Aug 23, 2015
Quick questions re 200f2 VR2 Lens Lust Jan 30, 2012
quick question on FX vs DX lenses Lens Lust Dec 17, 2010
Quick 300mm f2.8 question??? Lens Lust Mar 5, 2010
Quick Tamaron 17-50 question Lens Lust Dec 11, 2009