RAW Magick vs NC 4.2

Joined
Feb 1, 2005
Messages
1,591
Location
Williamstown NJ
Here is a quick test between the two programs. Pay attention to the detail in the Swan's neck feathers. I am sure that I could do a more scientific comparison, but in a larger blowup there is definitely more detail in the Raw Magick rendering. :) Has anyone else made any comparisons.

NC 4.2 Process

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)



Raw Magick

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
 
Joined
Feb 7, 2005
Messages
1,027
Location
Annandale, VA
EdMac said:
Here is a quick test between the two programs. Pay attention to the detail in the Swan's neck feathers. I am sure that I could do a more scientific comparison, but in a larger blowup there is definitely more detail in the Raw Magick rendering. :) Has anyone else made any comparisons.
Ed,

If you've been following the RML message thread you must be aware of some of the consternation about just how to use this product. Do you have time to briefly describe your RML workflow? I'm confused between how one uses the lchrominance/luminance under demosiacing and the Noise plug-in. How do you differentiate?

Thanks, Rich :?:
 
Joined
Jan 31, 2005
Messages
1,196
Location
Brooklyn, NY USA
Interesting...the RM shot definitely shows more detail in the highlights, but the NC shot looks lighter overall. I'd like to see more comparisons and also what the processing entailed for each.
 
Joined
Feb 2, 2005
Messages
34,936
Location
Arizona
Real Name
Chris
Where do I get NC 4.2? The Nikon site is such an unilluminated maze, I'm afraid to go look!

Well, lazy arse that I am, I'm off to search on my own, but incase I come back empty handed, could someone post the url?

¡Muchas Gracias!
 
Joined
Feb 1, 2005
Messages
1,591
Location
Williamstown NJ
Rich Gibson said:
EdMac said:
Here is a quick test between the two programs. Pay attention to the detail in the Swan's neck feathers. I am sure that I could do a more scientific comparison, but in a larger blowup there is definitely more detail in the Raw Magick rendering. :) Has anyone else made any comparisons.
Ed,

If you've been following the RML message thread you must be aware of some of the consternation about just how to use this product. Do you have time to briefly describe your RML workflow? I'm confused between how one uses the lchrominance/luminance under demosiacing and the Noise plug-in. How do you differentiate?

Thanks, Rich :?:
Hi Rich,
I did the following:
I opened the picture in RM and applied the increased Dynamic Range curve.
I locked the file and applied the Levels filter and increased the gamma to about 1.4
Then I saveed as a PSD
Opened in PSCS sized to fit web and sharpened.
As I said it was just a quick test.
 
Joined
Feb 1, 2005
Messages
1,591
Location
Williamstown NJ
jczinn said:
Interesting...the RM shot definitely shows more detail in the highlights, but the NC shot looks lighter overall. I'd like to see more comparisons and also what the processing entailed for each.
Hi Janet,
As I said earlier, this was not a very scientific test. I just wanted to see if I could get more detail in the feathers using RM. The first picture was converted using NC 4.2, and I do not believe that I used the D Lighting feature. The picture is a little too light now that I look at it. I had processed it earlier, and placed it on my SmugMug gallery. Last night, I decided to see if I could get more detail using RM. The next time, I will try and copy down my steps, and be a little more scientific. :)
 
Joined
Feb 7, 2005
Messages
1,027
Location
Annandale, VA
Edmac wrote

Hi Rich,
I did the following:
I opened the picture in RM and applied the increased Dynamic Range curve.
I locked the file and applied the Levels filter and increased the gamma to about 1.4
Then I saveed as a PSD
Opened in PSCS sized to fit web and sharpened.
As I said it was just a quick test.
Please be patient. I've worked with the beta a long time but I still am lost. 1. Where did the "increased dynamic range curve" come from?
2. Did you increase the gamma on the levels plug-in?
 
Joined
Feb 1, 2005
Messages
1,591
Location
Williamstown NJ
Rich Gibson said:
Edmac wrote

Hi Rich,
I did the following:
I opened the picture in RM and applied the increased Dynamic Range curve.
I locked the file and applied the Levels filter and increased the gamma to about 1.4
Then I saveed as a PSD
Opened in PSCS sized to fit web and sharpened.
As I said it was just a quick test.
Please be patient. I've worked with the beta a long time but I still am lost. 1. Where did the "increased dynamic range curve" come from?
2. Did you increase the gamma on the levels plug-in?
Hi Rich,
Yes it is a lot different than what we have been used to. One thing that I might suggest is that you download the video turtorials. THey should help a lot.
When I talk about increasing the dynamic range, I am talking about applying the maximum dynamic range curve. You do that by clicking on the button just below the "To Do" button on the right side of the screen. If you hover the mouse cursor over each button a dialog window will open explaining the function.
Yes I did increase the gamma by using the levels plug-in. I hope this helped. :)
 
Joined
Feb 7, 2005
Messages
1,027
Location
Annandale, VA
Hi Rich,
Yes it is a lot different than what we have been used to. One thing that I might suggest is that you download the video turtorials. THey should help a lot.
When I talk about increasing the dynamic range, I am talking about applying the maximum dynamic range curve. You do that by clicking on the button just below the "To Do" button on the right side of the screen. If you hover the mouse cursor over each button a dialog window will open explaining the function.
Yes I did increase the gamma by using the levels plug-in. I hope this helped. Smile
:oops: Oh....I know the one you're talking about. Sometimes you can feel so stupid!

Rich
 
Links on this page may be to our affiliates. Sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
Nikon Cafe is a fan site and not associated with Nikon Corporation.
Forum post reactions by Twemoji: https://github.com/twitter/twemoji
Copyright © 2005-2019 Amin Forums, LLC
Top Bottom