I currently have a D2H (not the 's' version) and contemplating the purchase of a D70, not only as a backup, but for any possible increase of resolution at larger print sizes. If this is true (from the 2 MP difference), then it would likely replace my D2H for studio portraiture. If its not true, then I don't really need it as a backup. All in all the D2H is much more of a camera. I can get both large prints as well as good color out of mine, though it can take a bit of work. Still, I can't help but notice the superb color and saturation of D70 images I find all over the web, with little to comapare with most D2H images I typically find online. It could just be that there are more D70 users posting images out there, or that they are using the D70 in a different way than most D2H users. If I had both cameras I would experiment by taking the same images, attempt to acheive the same colors and saturations, enlarge the same amount (greater than 8X12), print and check for differences between fine details as well as tonal ranges. I haven't seen any such tests between these two cameras, probably because they are not marketed in the same areas. I know some of you own both D2H and D70. Can you please tell me what, if any major benefit you receive from the extra 2 MP the D70 gives you? Or any perceived difference in the ability to process a broader range of tonal ranges? I'm primarily interested in the difference I might get where there is a lot of skin tone and texture, such as nudes under model lighting (also high contrast areas). Does the D70 capture, process and hold more detail under the scrutiny of editing and then printing at larger sizes, as compared to the D2H? Please tell me what you can. Any input would be highly valued. Thanks.