Samantha portrait with octabox

Joined
May 27, 2005
Messages
9,280
Location
Clearwater, Florida
My wife hated my last attempt at recreating a portrait of my oldest in this same outfit. The print promptly went in the garbage.

Here is my attempt today. My first shot with an octabox and the strobes. Can you tell I don't know what I'm doing?
Any suggestions would be appreciated.

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
 
Joined
Jan 29, 2005
Messages
33,450
Location
St. George, Utah
I like this image and think that you handled the lighting well. I will make one tiny suggestion that will improve the image quite a bit. Go to levels and move the left slider until it contacts the data in your histogram. I think you will see what I am talking about by way of improvement. This is such a cute shot of little Sam.
 
Joined
May 27, 2005
Messages
9,280
Location
Clearwater, Florida
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #5
I like this image and think that you handled the lighting well. I will make one tiny suggestion that will improve the image quite a bit. Go to levels and move the left slider until it contacts the data in your histogram. I think you will see what I am talking about by way of improvement. This is such a cute shot of little Sam.
Thanks for the tip, Gordon. When I look at the histogram, there is still a little bit of data on the left of the curve. While the image does look a little better with your suggestion, I wonder what data I am loosing by moving that slider.
 
M

Marina

Guest
Mitch, she looks great! I feel though your lighting was little bit overpowering. May be reducing exposure will do the trick.
Nicely done!
 
Joined
Sep 13, 2007
Messages
16,933
Location
Northern VA suburb of Washington, DC
Thanks for the tip, Gordon. When I look at the histogram, there is still a little bit of data on the left of the curve. While the image does look a little better with your suggestion, I wonder what data I am loosing by moving that slider.
I always go with what looks best. I wonder if sometimes the data isn't being reported completely accurately. It's not as if software always does what it is supposed to do.
 
Joined
May 27, 2005
Messages
9,280
Location
Clearwater, Florida
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #8
Everything about this image says, "I've got spunk and I'm darned proud of it." My point is that it's far more than just a picture. It's an image that immediately evokes a strong emotional response. Congratulations!
I always go with what looks best. I wonder if sometimes the data isn't being reported completely accurately. It's not as if software always does what it is supposed to do.
Mike,
I appreciate your comments here. Glad to see I've captured some of Samantha's spunkiness in this image.

I must agree with your thoughts on the histogram. Better to trust your own eyes than to stare at the peaks on the graph. I'll take a closer look at this one.
 
Joined
May 27, 2005
Messages
9,280
Location
Clearwater, Florida
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #9
Mitch, she looks great! I feel though your lighting was little bit overpowering. May be reducing exposure will do the trick.
Nicely done!
Thanks, Marina.

Do you find the lighting on the subject too overpowering or is the bright background bothering you?

This type of portrait is tricky for me because you are lighting two different objects. While you try to properly expose the subject, you try to overexpose the background by 1-2 stops. Perhaps I am looking at this the wrong way?:confused:
 
Joined
May 27, 2005
Messages
9,280
Location
Clearwater, Florida
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #10
Here's the original shot of Stefanie taken over 10 years ago.

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
 
Joined
May 12, 2006
Messages
1,133
Location
Norwalk, CT
Hey Mitch:

Looks good to me, maybe a little hot, but still good. The only thing I would do is clone out the second catch light. All in all a great capture and a definite improvement from your first attempt.
 
M

Marina

Guest
Thanks, Marina.

Do you find the lighting on the subject too overpowering or is the bright background bothering you?
I don't care about bg as much, my main focus always on the subject, especially in a studio (this is your new lighting, correct?, not the garage)

So yes, i found "hot" spots on her face to be a little too hot. Second shot you've posted looks a lot toned compare to yours.

I hope i explained myself somewhat clearly.


I hope you don't mind, i tried to play with it in CS. I'll remove it if you mind, just let me know.


Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
 
Joined
Jun 8, 2006
Messages
1,074
Location
SF Bay Area, California
Very nice shot of your pretty daughter. Wish I had all that studio stuff......

Hey, try one with your "garage" method. Now, at least I do have a garage!

Thanks for sharing. Always a pleasure to view your images of the kids.
 
Joined
May 27, 2005
Messages
9,280
Location
Clearwater, Florida
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #15
I don't care about bg as much, my main focus always on the subject, especially in a studio (this is your new lighting, correct?, not the garage)

So yes, i found "hot" spots on her face to be a little too hot. Second shot you've posted looks a lot toned compare to yours.

I hope i explained myself somewhat clearly.


I hope you don't mind, i tried to play with it in CS. I'll remove it if you mind, just let me know.


Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

Marina, thanks for playing with this one. I certainly don't mind. Could you tell me what you did when you "played"?

When I look at mine, the face looks a little hot, but it is not blown. You'd still like it toned down some more?
 
Joined
May 27, 2005
Messages
9,280
Location
Clearwater, Florida
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #16
Hey Mitch:

Looks good to me, maybe a little hot, but still good. The only thing I would do is clone out the second catch light. All in all a great capture and a definite improvement from your first attempt.

Thanks, Miguel. I was hoping you would look at this one.

I agree that the lighting is much better than my first try at this one. I must say that I love the soft, wrap around effect from the large octadome. Really a great diffuser.
 
Joined
Jan 13, 2006
Messages
1,937
Location
Nebraska, USA
You nailed it pretty good. The adjustment Marina did really helps it out.
Many times I have used two lights, but with one or two people it usually
works better to use one light and a reflector.
Nice work, Love the expression..very pretty!
 
Joined
Jul 20, 2007
Messages
603
Location
New England
Hi, Mitch -- really nice portrait (of course, your daughter is so cute it would be hard to fail)! I agree with previous comments that the original is a 'bit hot' and, IMHO, tweaking it slightly makes a nice portrait great. Love the broad light source you get from the octabox ...

Best Regards,
 
M

Marina

Guest
Marina, thanks for playing with this one. I certainly don't mind. Could you tell me what you did when you "played"?

When I look at mine, the face looks a little hot, but it is not blown. You'd still like it toned down some more?
Mitch, all i did was adjust highlights via shadow/highlights option in CS. One more thing i did is cloned out second light in her eyes, nothing fancy.

Give it a try, there are few different things you can do. Do you shoot RAW at all?
 
Joined
May 12, 2006
Messages
1,133
Location
Norwalk, CT
Thanks, Miguel. I was hoping you would look at this one.

I agree that the lighting is much better than my first try at this one. I must say that I love the soft, wrap around effect from the large octadome. Really a great diffuser.
I haven't been around much lately, but I'm trying to catch up. The large octadome works nicely. I get similar results with my large (36x48) Softbox, which is why I didn't use it for my last shoot. The smaller box gave me more control on where I wanted the light. Although I prefer to shoot portraits with the large box for the soft wrap around light.
 
Links on this page may be to our affiliates. Sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
Nikon Cafe is a fan site and not associated with Nikon Corporation.
Forum post reactions by Twemoji: https://github.com/twitter/twemoji
Copyright © 2005-2019 Amin Forums, LLC
Top Bottom