Sigma 150-500 Bird Shots

Joined
Mar 15, 2008
Messages
762
Location
North Carolina
Got this lens today -- so far I'm on the line as to keeping the lens. Shot handheld at 800 ISO -- it was late evening -- so I'll try again in bright sun tomorrow.

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


View attachment 223221

View attachment 223222

I think they are all at 500mm bird shots have been cropped. All have been PP with sharpening.

What do you think
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Joined
Mar 15, 2008
Messages
762
Location
North Carolina
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #5
The crops were about 50% -- the butterfly had the sun directly behind it's tattered wings.

I did not use a tripod. These were quick a dirty shots late in the evening. I'd just gotten the lens and wanted to see what it would do. I've not been overly impressed so far.
 
Joined
May 13, 2007
Messages
684
Location
Modesto, CA
frankly i have no respect for any sigma telephoto's except the 120-300....the 50-500 was aweful

good luck
Let's give the lens sometime, it is still new. But we can agree that the 50-500 isn't all that great. I have seen some good shots from the 150-500. Let's wait and see more shots of this young beast.
 
D

DW Brewer

Guest
At the risk of "hijacking this thread," I must interject here that I use five Sigma lenses in my business. My clients have no objections at all about the quality of images I produce from these lenses. Like all manufacturers, there are great lenses and some not so great in every lens manufacturer's lineup.
I agree with the above post: give it time. Besides, most of us image with what we can afford, not necessarily with what we might wish we had. I don't think the original poster had any intention of opening this post for a diatribe on the quality of any particular lens lineup.
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2005
Messages
2,394
Location
Nebraska
Sigma

Don't blast all the Sigma telephotos/zooms until you have tired the 300-800. I love mine.
 
D

DW Brewer

Guest
Sorry Randy; but as a former teacher, I find your comments far from meeting any accepted criteria as "feedback." To be accepted as feedback, the commentary must contain the following components:
1) An indication of what behavior, function, result, etc. is less than satisfactory; and
2) 0ffer a remedy or solution to the perceived deficiency.
Under no circumstances does "ouch," "double ouch" or a stated opinion about Sigma telephoto lenses meet any of the above criteria. They qualify as opinions only, and while you are certainly entitled to your opinions, don't be guilty of masking same as legitimate feedback. I am going out on a limb here somewhat, but the Moderator of this forum is also an educator (Wade: Commodorefirst), and I trust my commentary about requisite components of feedback will meet his approval. You are correct: "...there's no need to take an attitude." Constructive feedback mitigates the potential for attitude; blatant, unfounded opions promote same.
 
Joined
May 20, 2005
Messages
9,393
Location
Hazlet Township, NJ USA
What thread was the RayLarson photo taken from? I don't see it in this thread. No offense to Ray but if that's the best that lens can do at 500mm I just took that off my wish list.:eek:
 
Joined
May 11, 2006
Messages
42,682
Location
CHARLOTTE
Real Name
Randy
What thread was the RayLarson photo taken from? I don't see it in this thread. No offense to Ray but if that's the best that lens can do at 500mm I just took that off my wish list.:eek:
he deleted it as i will also...we all post stuff we regret latter and I should have never posted my rude 'double ouch' comment.....
 
D

DW Brewer

Guest
In a PM I received today, Ray Larson deleted his photo and indicated he has decided not to participate further in this forum. It is a Black Day for Nikoncafe.
 
Joined
Mar 27, 2007
Messages
476
Location
Pawtucket, RI
Last edited by a moderator:
Joined
Jan 29, 2008
Messages
1,162
Location
lafayette, louisiana
Ray,
you are quite welcome, I do believe after years of doing photography that technique is of vital importance much more than "name brand" equipment. keep up the great work.
Kevin P.
 
Joined
Feb 11, 2007
Messages
2,222
Location
Orlando, Florida
But, why would one show off a lens in the worst case? Any lens can have images look bad if used incorrectly or under bad lighting. I would think one would want to show the best the lens can do. IMHO.

Nancy
 
Joined
May 11, 2006
Messages
42,682
Location
CHARLOTTE
Real Name
Randy
But, why would one show off a lens in the worst case? Any lens can have images look bad if used incorrectly or under bad lighting. I would think one would want to show the best the lens can do. IMHO.

Nancy
I agree, especially for a sigma lens that appears to be the replacement for the 50-500....i did see one good shot from this lens over in the LL forum but I still think it's just a rewrapped 50-500.....
 
Joined
May 11, 2006
Messages
42,682
Location
CHARLOTTE
Real Name
Randy
Last edited by a moderator:
Links on this page may be to our affiliates. Sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
Nikon Cafe is a fan site and not associated with Nikon Corporation.
Forum post reactions by Twemoji: https://github.com/twitter/twemoji
Copyright © 2005-2019 Amin Forums, LLC
Top Bottom