Sigma 70-200 2.8 - soft or just me?

Discussion in 'Lens Lust' started by pward76, Sep 8, 2008.

  1. pward76

    pward76

    105
    Apr 6, 2008
    iowa
    New Sigma 70-200 Macro this weekend. Shot these and I am a little disappointed. They look a bit soft. Had the 300 on a monopod, These are cropped but no other processing at all.

    I would really appreciate some CC, as I am boxing up the lens to ship it back. I'm wondering if it could be my technique. I did notice that a few at f4 were sharper than those at 2.8 or 3.2,3.5 etc.

    200mm f3.2 1/800
    mitchking1.



    120mm f4 1/1250
    DJK1.



    200mm f3.5 1/2000
    bigeyes1.



    185mm f2.8 1/1600
    heisman1.
     
  2. rotxlk82

    rotxlk82

    Jul 20, 2007
    UK
    Ok... I must admit these do look a little soft to me as well

    Firstly were you using a filter? I used to have this glass and the IQ was ruined by a cheap filter

    If that's not the case have you tested the lens for front/backfocus, I have heard a lot of stories about this lens being slightly off and require recalibration.
     
  3. pward76

    pward76

    105
    Apr 6, 2008
    iowa
    Yes I did have a filter, good point. I'll try a few without it and see what happens. What is the best way to test for back/front focus?
     
  4. rotxlk82

    rotxlk82

    Jul 20, 2007
    UK
    Ok, well the really cheap one on my camera was totally trashing the IQ, the images I was getting (especially at F2.8 and longer focal lenghts looked very much like yours).

    Being an idiot I never realised the filter was behind this (Sigma looked at and told me it was fine) and so I sold the lens at a loss assuming it was somehow faulty.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.