Strobist: cyclist portrait

Joined
Jan 26, 2005
Messages
1,011
Location
San Jose, CA
I used a cyclist theme, since that's Kim's favorite form of exercise. The sun was blistering bright, but I used the gym building as my gobo, and the resulting open shade as my fill. The main was an sb800 on a stand at camera left. I positioned the flash at 7 feet high, and fired into into a white 45" umbrella. The trigger was my trusty su800.


Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)



View attachment 99348


View attachment 99349


Note: the wind was very gusty, but my tent spike/bungee cord technique worked a charm, and the lightstand was as stable as a rock!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
S

sharkync

Guest
Very Nice Shots & A Question

Frank - good job! I was wondering what your camera's meter indicated as the proper f stop and shutter speed for the available light. As you used your flash as the main light (adding light), how did that affect your settings?
 
Joined
Jan 26, 2005
Messages
1,011
Location
San Jose, CA
I was wondering what your camera's meter indicated as the proper f stop and shutter speed for the available light.
The meter doesn't give me a shutter and aperture setting. I choose an aperture and shutter, and the meter tells me if the shot is overexposed, properly exposed, or under exposed... and by how much. I chose an aperture and shutter combination that underexposed the ambient by 2 stops.

As you used your flash as the main light (adding light), how did that affect your settings?
The flash had no impact on the background, or on the side of the model's face that was hidden from it.
 
Joined
Nov 7, 2005
Messages
650
Location
Thailand
Frank the light is nice, but I find the tack sharp bushes in the BG very distracting. I think if you'd have moved her out from the BG and used a longer lens, they'd be much better.
 
Joined
Jan 26, 2005
Messages
1,011
Location
San Jose, CA
Frank the light is nice, but I find the tack sharp bushes in the BG very distracting. I think if you'd have moved her out from the BG and used a longer lens, they'd be much better.
I agree. The background is marginal at best... at least in the web version. Fortunately, it's much better in print. The lens was long enough, but the shade only extended a few feet in front of the background at that time of the day... and it was the only time of the day that Kim and I both had available.
 

Latest posts

Links on this page may be to our affiliates. Sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
Nikon Cafe is a fan site and not associated with Nikon Corporation.
Forum post reactions by Twemoji: https://github.com/twitter/twemoji
Copyright © 2005-2019 Amin Forums, LLC
Top Bottom