Tamron 17-50 2.8

Joined
Jan 28, 2007
Messages
2,843
Location
Houston Tx.
I would love to know how good this lens is. I need a good low light lens without breaking the bank. Does anyone have any opinions or samples? Thanks in advance. Jimmy
 
Joined
Dec 28, 2006
Messages
300
Location
U.S. D.C. area
I also would like to find out more about this lens. I do know that sam stern (wedding guy) over on dpreview raves about it. Search on his name (if you can ever find a time when search is working) and you should find some information.
 
Joined
Feb 24, 2006
Messages
490
Location
Belgium
I am a big fan of that lens. I was intending to buy the Nikkor 17-55 (I was prepared to spend that money), went to the shop, and thanks to the advice of a colleague on FM (Nikt), I did a comparison between the Nikkor, the Tamron and my 50mm 1.8@2.8. In fact I could not see a difference in the pictures (non scientific testing based on pics outside the shop). Since I was going to use that lens occasionally, I decided to go for the Tamron, at a quarter of the price of the Nikkor. The Tamron is optically on par with the Nikkor. The Nikkor has a few advantages: fantastic build quality and slightly faster AF with built in motor (AF-S). On the other hand, the compactness and light weight of the Tamron are a big advantage to me.
You can have a look at the reviews on www.photozone.de to get more scientific data about those lenses.
Here are a few simple shots I posted some time ago:
http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/518415/0#4473351
and my short review on my website:
http://users.skynet.be/van.hooveld/Reviews/tamron1750.html

Hope this helps
 
Joined
Feb 17, 2006
Messages
195
Location
Nova Scotia
I just got this lens the other day and I really like it so far. It's sharper than my 18-70 kit lens. It may just be me, but I think the Tamron produces warmer colors than my Nikon, I guess you could say "punchier". Focus is noisier, but seems just a accurate as the Nikon. I did notice issues with my SB80dx Flash. It was overexposing everything. I cleaned the contacts on the mount and everything seems pretty good now. I'm very happy with my purchase.

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


Not the greatest images, but I haven't had a chance to out with the lens yet. Sharpening is set to high in-camera and i'm using a custom curve on my D1X. All other settings are "normal". Raw converted to Jpeg via CaptureNX.
 
Joined
Jan 2, 2007
Messages
966
Location
Nottingham, UK
This is a lens I'm very interested in and might buy once I'm in Japan. There is some sample variation in this as they don't all come out of the same factory, so make sure you can try out a number of samples before you buy.
 
Joined
May 7, 2005
Messages
413
Location
Bloomington, Indiana USA
I have the 17-50 Tamron and like it. I did have to return my copy because it front focused, it was only noticeable at 2.8 and is just fine now.
These were all shot at f11 on a D100. The color, contrast and detail produced with this lens , IMHO, is fantastic. I haven't compared it to the Nikkor 17-55.

Best Regards

RB

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


View attachment 88472

View attachment 88473

View attachment 88474
 
Joined
Jan 28, 2007
Messages
2,843
Location
Houston Tx.
Thanks for all the great info and pictures. There is part of me saying go for it and another saying save up for the nikon. I have enough cash for the tamron right now and it may be a while before I can justify the nikon. I drive myself crazy with these lenses. Thanks again.
 
Joined
Feb 26, 2007
Messages
2,163
Location
BUCKEYE STATE
These were all shot at f11 on a D100. The color, contrast and detail produced with this lens , IMHO, is fantastic. I haven't compared it to the Nikkor 17-55.

Best Regards

RB

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


View attachment 88476

View attachment 88477

View attachment 88478
RB, These are beautiful shots. I hope I can do as well with my copy of the Tammy 17-50 when the weather finally co-operates in Ohio.
 
Joined
Sep 2, 2006
Messages
49
Location
Los Angeles, CA
It is a great lens.... if you get a good sample that doesn't front focus.

I used to have one that used to front focus... eventually sold it and got a 17-55mm.
 
Joined
Jul 13, 2005
Messages
1,535
Location
Helsinki, Finland
Hi Jimmy!

I have had mine about a week and so far I´m very happy with it. I bought it to replace Nikkor 18-70 and I´ll say the same as Elroy about it being sharper.
I haven´t noticed any problems with it, exept low-light (indoors) it sometimes hesitates a bit before locking the focus...

Here´s some snaps during the one week ownership (with D200):

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
 
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Messages
80
Location
Oak Grove, Missouri
love it

i did a lengthy search before getting mine. i couldn't be happier.
and like somebody said, the nikon is probably better....but CERTAINLY NOT 4 times better.
Sam Sterns raves are dead on.

matt
 

Latest posts

Links on this page may be to our affiliates. Sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
Nikon Cafe is a fan site and not associated with Nikon Corporation.
Forum post reactions by Twemoji: https://github.com/twitter/twemoji
Copyright © 2005-2019 Amin Forums, LLC
Top Bottom