The 400vr, so Refreshing

Joined
May 11, 2006
Messages
42,637
Location
CHARLOTTE
Real Name
Randy
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #22
and i thought he was kidding me w/ his post

now i can handle someone calling my work 'bad' if they just explain why....

i'm the 1st to admit i post too much here, there and everywhere but it's all for fun and to also show what the glass can do....
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Joined
Nov 3, 2007
Messages
427
Location
Anaheim, CA
and i thought you were just kidding.....

if you think this is a so-so shot post something better, OK ?
or how about just post something, anything will do....
I looked at your last 20 threads, do you use your gear or just comment on others
ofcourse i use my gear.

http://aphanphoto.com/gallery/thumbnails.php?album=13
http://aphanphoto.com/gallery/thumbnails.php?album=18

I just don't flood the forum with it. I know you happy with your new toy but this is "lens lusted" area, it is for something stunning, lusting. Just don't spam the forum with it. Didn't you just have a thread about this (same guy) few days ago: https://www.nikoncafe.com/vforums/showthread.php?t=236287 and EXACT same image that you already created a thread here few days ago too: https://www.nikoncafe.com/vforums/showthread.php?t=236127. or here: https://www.nikoncafe.com/vforums/showthread.php?t=236286

Randy, let not escalate this to something out of control. I don't mean to insult your picture. Just my honest opinion. You don't like it, I'll not comment on your future thread. Cool? :biggrin:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Joined
May 11, 2006
Messages
42,637
Location
CHARLOTTE
Real Name
Randy
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #25
ofcourse i use my gear. I just don't flood the forum with it. I know you happy with your new toy but this is "lens lusted" area, it is for something stunning, lusting. Just don't spam the forum with it. Didn't you just have a thread about this (same guy) few days ago: https://www.nikoncafe.com/vforums/showthread.php?t=236287


http://aphanphoto.com/gallery/thumbnails.php?album=13
http://aphanphoto.com/gallery/thumbnails.php?album=18

Randy, let not escalate this to something out of control. I don't mean to insult your picture. Just my honest opinion. You don't like it, I'll not comment on your future thread. Cool? :biggrin:

why i think you've done a good job of that

& btw, C&C is always welcome, but 'BAD example' doesn't cut it
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Commodorefirst

Admin/Moderator
Administrator
Joined
May 1, 2005
Messages
21,242
Location
Missouri
Ok folks, chill out, I have done some editing, lets all agree to disagree...........but let us please not name call or quote the name calling,
 
Joined
Jun 30, 2008
Messages
301
Location
Netherlands
Randy,

As I am looking for some longer glass, I always look at your threads and pictures. These are always very informative for me as they give me a lot of information about the possibilities of these lenses. Keep on posting!! :wink:
 
Joined
Nov 17, 2007
Messages
2,727
Location
USA
SmugMug is very good at what they do...

Hi Randy-

I took your advice (I think it was yours) and joined SmugMug to host my files:

here

I know that when I view the smugmug version of one of my pix versus the facebook version, there is no comparison. Facebook reduces the contrast and the sharpness for the sake of file size (after all they are hosting 9 quadrillion photos). So it doesn't surprise me that the SmugMug image preserves the superb sharpness of your photo. It also doesn't surprise me that Microsoft would come up with a great algorithm for resizing pictures as well (they hire the top 100 mathematicians every year the way the NFL drafts rookies)...

As to showing off 400VR shots, I agree with Glenn, that either I should be able to block these threads or you should have your own site with a warning: "Do you make $300K per year? If not, please do not enter this site!"

Jeff
 
Joined
Jan 18, 2008
Messages
531
Location
Warrenton, VA
see any dif in these 2 ?

1. rezied to a 1024 using the MS Resize utility
2. Original posted as a 1024 (smugmug does the resize).
BOTH are outstanding for two gray-haired guys, re: the Subject and the Photog!
:tongue:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
L

LSSE

Guest
that's a really nice shot. that lens sure can keep up with action.
 
Joined
Jul 26, 2008
Messages
2,075
Location
San Diego, CA
thanks Joey

i don't see it but it was resized w/ MS' resize utility so I could post the O version and keep the EXIF

I'm gonna upload the original and try posting that to see

[edit], it's your eyes, your monitor, or you are joshing me (like that bubble guy)
Randy, honestly I'm not sure what it is. Both versions (the new one you put up) as well as the old one, just seem a little off to be. I think its an insane image and perfectly timed, but for some reason the quality seems a bit lacking. Maybe its just my eyes playing tricks on me, as I know the 400vr is a fantastic lens and you are a fantastic shooter :biggrin:

I just bought Michael's 400 2.8 AF-S version 1, I can't wait to return from Europe to try it out :eek: 2 more weeks!!! :biggrin:
 
Joined
Jan 26, 2009
Messages
853
Location
Woodstock GA
For what its worht i think the first one grabs me better than the second and i hav eno idea why, it just does.

They are stunning shots and i might need a 400VR too if only i could make it do magic tricks like you do.
 
Joined
May 11, 2006
Messages
42,637
Location
CHARLOTTE
Real Name
Randy
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #38
Randy,

As I am looking for some longer glass, I always look at your threads and pictures. These are always very informative for me as they give me a lot of information about the possibilities of these lenses. Keep on posting!! :wink:
Hi Johan
Thanks

Hi Randy-

I took your advice (I think it was yours) and joined SmugMug to host my files:

here

I know that when I view the smugmug version of one of my pix versus the facebook version, there is no comparison. Facebook reduces the contrast and the sharpness for the sake of file size (after all they are hosting 9 quadrillion photos). So it doesn't surprise me that the SmugMug image preserves the superb sharpness of your photo. It also doesn't surprise me that Microsoft would come up with a great algorithm for resizing pictures as well (they hire the top 100 mathematicians every year the way the NFL drafts rookies)...

As to showing off 400VR shots, I agree with Glenn, that either I should be able to block these threads or you should have your own site with a warning: "Do you make $300K per year? If not, please do not enter this site!"

Jeff
thx Jeff
your website looks great

BOTH are outstanding for two gray-haired guys, re: the Subject and the Photog!
:tongue:
thx John:smile:

that's a really nice shot. that lens sure can keep up with action.
thanks

Great action shot! I like the look on his face.
thanks Will

For what it is worth I think it is a great shot. (tip,to ignore infuriates)
thanks...yea I tried that when I thought he was kidding but shuda just ignored him

Randy, honestly I'm not sure what it is. Both versions (the new one you put up) as well as the old one, just seem a little off to be. I think its an insane image and perfectly timed, but for some reason the quality seems a bit lacking. Maybe its just my eyes playing tricks on me, as I know the 400vr is a fantastic lens and you are a fantastic shooter :biggrin:

I just bought Michael's 400 2.8 AF-S version 1, I can't wait to return from Europe to try it out :eek: 2 more weeks!!! :biggrin:
thx Joey
congrats on the lens, I'm loking forward to some Ga Tech football shots

For what its worht i think the first one grabs me better than the second and i hav eno idea why, it just does.

They are stunning shots and i might need a 400VR too if only i could make it do magic tricks like you do.
thx Tony
 
Joined
Feb 18, 2008
Messages
474
Location
Wales
I have to admit I'm not too keen on your shots either Randy, ..........

because they are better than mine.:wink:

Must admit though, maybe it's my failing eyesight, but I can't tell the difference between the two shots.
 
Joined
May 11, 2006
Messages
42,637
Location
CHARLOTTE
Real Name
Randy
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #40
I have to admit I'm not too keen on your shots either Randy, ..........

because they are better than mine.:wink:

Must admit though, maybe it's my failing eyesight, but I can't tell the difference between the two shots.
thx Dave

there should be no diff
i used to think MS' Resize util degraded images and smugmug did a better job but not anymore
 
Links on this page may be to our affiliates. Sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
Nikon Cafe is a fan site and not associated with Nikon Corporation.
Forum post reactions by Twemoji: https://github.com/twitter/twemoji
Copyright © 2005-2019 Amin Forums, LLC
Top Bottom