Thinking about Teleconverter for 70-200VR

Joined
Apr 6, 2005
Messages
425
Location
Glen Allen, Virginia
Would love to have the reach of the 2.0 but hear its soft...the 1.7 seems like it would work as well but dont know much about it...the 1.4 seems like it would be that much more reach....opinions/suggestions?
 
Joined
Jan 29, 2005
Messages
3,423
Location
Edmonton, Alberta
I have the 14eII and works like a charm, cant honestly say I see any degradation.........a must have and you cant go wrong!
 
Joined
Mar 11, 2005
Messages
5,963
Location
SF Bay Area, California
Had the same problem myself. I wanted that 2.0 reach really badly, but in the end, I purchased the 1.7eII. Here's one of my shots with that combo.

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


Virginia
aka beaucamera
 
Joined
Jan 26, 2005
Messages
15,253
Location
Marysville, WA
If I didn't already have the 14E and the 20E, and could only get one, I'd go for the 17E, which I may add anyway. I think I have gotten lucky with the copy of th 20E that I have:

This is an unusual image in that it is my D2H with the Sigma 500 f4.5 HSM plus the TC 14E plus the TC 20E. I don't do this often, but since I have seen the results I am willing to give it a go now and then. Mounted on a Wimberly Sidekick, Kirk BH-3 and Gitzo 1228, all locked down tight as a drum and me holding my breath :wink: .
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


Here is another with just the TC 20E mounted to a Sigma 120-300 f2.8 HSM:
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


From what I have seen of the 17E it looks superb as well. These TC's have been modified to work with the non-AFS lenses.
 
Joined
Jan 26, 2005
Messages
3,479
Location
Florida
Hi Yahtzee,

I know that David M. (Mutter) first had the 2.0 converter with the 70-200VR and he wasn't pleased with it..You may want to ask him about your question.

Gaye
 
Joined
Mar 24, 2005
Messages
1,275
Location
Bainbridge Island, Washington
I now have all three. I just got the 1.7 last week and I use all three in different shooting circumstances. Each has it's place and use.

The 1.4 is almost like having no TC attached. I notice no difference at all inn the image except for a bit more reach and a very small f stop hit.

The 2.0 can yield a nice image if it is on a good tripod and the VR is off (if you are using a VR lens). It also costs a bit of speed with a loss of two f-stops. Okay for outdoor in good light but a compromise in less than perfect light. I don't recommend it for hand held use but you can get lucky at high shutter speeds. again this is compromise because you give up some DOF with a larger aperture and higher shutter speed (which could be desireable in some cases for the bokeh).

The 1.7 seems to be the one to go with if you can only have one. It is sharper than the 2.0 and costs less in f stop speed. It will yield more hand held keepers than the 2.0. Probably less than the 1.4 (if you are a perfectionist) but on a tripod I don't see any significant difference between the 1.4 and the 1.7 as far as detail and contrast.

If you are mostley shooting hand held and have a VR lens and occasionally use a tripod, I would go with the 1.7. It also works great with the 2x crop sensor of the D2x (HSC).

Handheld comparisons are difficult because each shooting circumstance and each user has a different ability to hold a camera still and this is really the test of a TC because most shots in the real world are hand held.

None is really a replacement for a quality long lense, but the portable size and weight can make a very nice companion while traveling to a 70-200 without breaking your back or the bank.
 
Joined
Mar 31, 2005
Messages
14,469
Location
Toronto Canada
I have the two: TC14EII and the TC20EII. Very pleased with the 14 on the 70-200VR, the 20 is noticeably softer but then again, was using both handheld. I love very sharp, crisp images so I'll probably be using the 14 more than the 20 - will save the 20 for tripod, no VR shots, as suggested. Have always been planning on doing tripod sharpness tests but haven't gotten around to it.
 
Joined
May 3, 2005
Messages
182
Location
Vancouver, BC
Question for all: I didn't think you could use the Nikon teleconverters with other lenses, i.e. Bill talks of using them with Sigma lenses??

linm
 
Joined
Jan 26, 2005
Messages
15,253
Location
Marysville, WA
linm said:
Question for all: I didn't think you could use the Nikon teleconverters with other lenses, i.e. Bill talks of using them with Sigma lenses??

linm
Yup, you just have to cheat :wink:

Here is a link to the information, be forewarned this will void your warranty as you have to modify the ring on the mount to remove a very small tab. In theory you could do this without removing the ring, but I would not attempt that myself, this modification does not affect the performance on Nikon AFS lenses at all.

http://nikonpages.heymanphotography.com/tcmod/

This allows you to do a couple of things.

1. Use the TC's on non-Nikon lenses
2. Use them on non-AFS lenses
3. Stack either the TC-14 or the TC-17 along with the TC-20 for the massive reach you see above

As I stated in my post above, perhaps I am just lucky as I don't see really bad fall-off in quality with my TC-20, even when stacked, then again maybe my eyes are just bad or I'm not at all picky :lol:

Along with the loss of light, the focal length multiplier is not reported when I use these with my Sigma lenses which is why the GBH shot above shows 500mm and not 1400mm.
 
Joined
May 3, 2005
Messages
182
Location
Vancouver, BC
Purpose of small tab?

Bill;

Do you know the purpose of the small tab? What, if any, functionality will I lose by removing it?

It looks easy to do, but, I'm nervous about it!

Lin
 
Joined
May 1, 2005
Messages
2,221
Location
San Antonio TX
Here's the 70-200+1.7tc. at 340mm. Not too bad for handheld 510mm 35mm equivalent.

The shot was wide open and I was showing the combo to one of my partners and I specifically set out to isolate her husband in the crowd with the very selective DOF.
Sharp enough wide open and DOF just right to my eyes for this purpose.

The 1.7 is the nice in-the-middle TC compromise for me. 1.4 rarely used now, maybe never.

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
 
M

mca

Guest
Hey Guy's

I have both the 20x 1.7 t/c I used mostly the 1.7 with my 70-200vr are you saying to keep the vr off? I shoot mainly baseball with my d2x. most of time it's hand held. thank's mike
 

Latest posts

Links on this page may be to our affiliates. Sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
Nikon Cafe is a fan site and not associated with Nikon Corporation.
Forum post reactions by Twemoji: https://github.com/twitter/twemoji
Copyright © 2005-2019 Amin Forums, LLC
Top Bottom