Two budget lenses for D80

Joined
Jul 18, 2008
Messages
42
Location
Australia
I am considering these lenses:

Tokina 12-24mm f/4
Nikkor 24-85mm f/2-/f4

Tokina 12-24mm f/4
Nikkor 24-85mm f/3.5-f/4.5 AF-S

Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8
Nikkor 18-70mm f/3.5-f/4.5 AF-S

Tokina will bought brand new.

Nikkor 18-70mm is a good kit lens; many of them are sold in used conditions.

I know a little about the 24-85mm lenses. The slow version of the two has been discontinued.

Could someone please comment on my choice and recommend other lenses to consider in the range of 12-80mm.

Thanks!
 
Joined
May 29, 2008
Messages
488
Location
Cambridge, MA
Tokina 12-24 is a sweet lens.

I like the first option... probably because I wouldn't really use the 11-16 @ f2.8 (I'd only use it for landscape and thus usually f4 +).

I like a little longer range so I went Tamron 17-50 and 28-300VC... but the Tokina 12-24 is high on my list and prob. my next buy.
 
Joined
Jul 18, 2008
Messages
42
Location
Australia
I looked at Tamron 17-50mm. There have been so many complaints posted on various resources about its QC problems. So I am considering budget Nikkor lenses instead
 
Joined
Apr 26, 2008
Messages
929
Location
Texas
For around the same cost as the 18-70 you could get the 18-135 and have more reach. Later you could add a Sigma 10-20 or similar and have more width at the other end.
 
Joined
Jun 23, 2007
Messages
314
Location
UK
It depends what you plan on shooting but you might find the split at 24mm annoying on a DX body like the D80 -- especially as you seem to be developing wide angle tendencies. :smile:

[Rounding numbers to the standard lenses: DX digital 18mm -> FX (Film) 28mm, DX 24mm -> FX 35mm]

I'd be tempted to take the lead from Nikon and go for an 18-xxx lens, and the 18-70 is a good choice.

Perhaps leave the decision on the wide angle for later. You might even find you'd like some overlap using the 12-24 or Sigma 10-20.

You might find this useful http://www.naturfotograf.com/index2.html
 
Joined
Apr 26, 2008
Messages
929
Location
Texas
What do you shoot? Do you have other lenses not listed? If so, which? If not, what do you shoot that you don't need/want a lens over 85mm?
 
Joined
Jul 18, 2008
Messages
42
Location
Australia
What do you shoot? Do you have other lenses not listed? If so, which? If not, what do you shoot that you don't need/want a lens over 85mm?
:smile::biggrin:

Believe it or not some people only have 2 fixed focal length lenses for their MF 6x7 cameras, and make a living from selling their images captured on these lenses.
 
Joined
May 6, 2005
Messages
5,482
Location
NY
There are lots of good choices at the wide end, and the Tokina 12-24 receives much acclaim.
I'd look into the Tamron 28-75 2.8 or the Nikon 35-70 2.8 for the midrange zoom.
The 18-xxX zooms would overlap your wide angle zoom and are slower than the f/2.8 options.
 
Joined
Feb 25, 2008
Messages
106
Location
Bergen, Norway
What do you shoot? Do you have other lenses not listed? If so, which? If not, what do you shoot that you don't need/want a lens over 85mm?
Hm. Personally I feel that longer than ca 85 is kinda rarely useful, for me. On 1.5x crop anyway. A lot of the time I bring the Voigtlander 58mm as my longest lens; I sometimes take the Nikon 85/1.8 if I tnink I need "long". This is all up to personal shooting style, and "how one sees the world".

Now, to answer the original question: on a budget, I would consider Tokina 12-24 and Tamron 28-75 f/2.8.
 
Joined
Jan 27, 2008
Messages
1,025
Location
North Carolina
There was a thread here on the cafe earlier in the week extolling the virtues of the Nikon 18-135. Seems the general consensus is although a little slow, it's extremely sharp through all of the ranges. There were some great shots posted using this lens as well.

Keith
North Carolina
 
Joined
Nov 21, 2007
Messages
771
Location
Greater NYC
Speaking from experience, I like the Tokina 12-24, and use the Nikon 24-85 2.8-4 fairly often. They're my standard low/mid carry kit along with the 'long' 70-200.

The 24-85 is versatile - just shade it if pointing towards light. .... nice if rarely used Macro capability as well. Still haven't convinced myself to splurge for a 24-70 or 28-70 to replace it.
 
Joined
May 16, 2006
Messages
9,081
Location
Oregon
The 24-85 DS 2.8-4 is my "One in All travel" when I not taking more than one lens because I always use the close focus/macro and the 2.8 @ 24. I've found it be a good performer when I evaluate it against my Nikkors: 12-24, 80-200 2r, and 300 AFS.

But if you want new its about $600, which in my mind is not a budget lens. I think the 12-24 is a great choice, perhaps matched with the 24-85 D. At times I have taken my 12-24 & 24-85D for "city trips" and find that it covers 99% of what I want to shoot.

12-24 is a great range for DX cameras....
 
Links on this page may be to our affiliates. Sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
Nikon Cafe is a fan site and not associated with Nikon Corporation.
Forum post reactions by Twemoji: https://github.com/twitter/twemoji
Copyright © 2005-2019 Amin Forums, LLC
Top Bottom