Upgrade path, which would you do?

Discussion in 'Lens Lust' started by davidzvi, Jun 7, 2007.

  1. davidzvi

    davidzvi

    Apr 30, 2005
    Massachusetts
    David
    I have 2 lenses for sale on the forum and I plan to upgrade. But I'm having a hard time choosing between two options.

    First
    70-200 AF-S vr
    1.4 or 1.7 tc

    Pros:
    • better glass then the others
    • longer than the 50-150
    • hand holding at lower shutter speeds

    Second
    50-150 Sigma
    70-300 AF-S vr
    30 1.4 Sigma

    Pros:
    • 50 versus 70 on the low end
    • 50-150 is smaller and lighter than the 70-200
    • 70-300 is smaller and ligher then 70-200 with TC and probably good enough for what I would be using it for
    • 30 1.4 would go nicely with my 85 1.4

    And although it would be nice, can't combine some from column a and b, can't afford to.

    I shoot events (weddings, bar mitzvahs, etc) and protraits for work. But I enjoy nature, birds, buildings, etc as well I just don't get paid for it at the moment.

    Here is a client area gallery I created and got releases for, Bar and Bat Mitzvahs (Bar = boys and Bat = girls for those that might not know) and house parties.
    http://www.blueberryphoto.com/gallery/2967783

    Password is: demo
     
  2. koolk2

    koolk2

    79
    Sep 9, 2006
    David,

    Why not the Sigma 70-200 f2.8 with a Sigma 1.4 TC. This could be had used for about $600-700. Then get the Sigma 30 f1.4 for about $400 and you're all set.
     
  3. davidzvi

    davidzvi

    Apr 30, 2005
    Massachusetts
    David
    Though briefly about that, but at 200mm for the work I do I think VR would be better.
     
  4. Gale

    Gale

    978
    Jan 26, 2005
    Viera Fl
    Option 1
     
  5. Commodorefirst

    Commodorefirst Admin/Moderator Administrator

    May 1, 2005
    Missouri
    Option 1




    ( I did the same wording as above on purpose, upgrade the glass to the best if you can afford it, and get a 35 f2 to suplement until next big purchase)

    Wade
     
  6. opt 1 as well
     
  7. gadgetguy11

    gadgetguy11

    Nov 16, 2005
    Kentucky
    Option 1.
     
  8. Macusque

    Macusque

    66
    May 18, 2007
    Verona, Italy
    Option 1.

    And try to find a nice used 35/2 to go with your 85/1.4.
     
  9. plusfour

    plusfour Guest

    Same as everyone else - option 1. Easy.
     
  10. ibcj

    ibcj

    732
    Dec 19, 2006
    New York
    Go with option 1 and then you won't think about the 70-200 that you almost bought.
     
  11. davidzvi

    davidzvi

    Apr 30, 2005
    Massachusetts
    David
    Actually I had one and sold it a while ago, so there wouldn't be any of that. I liked the lens, but for what I was doing at the time I found I wasn't using it. Yes I know it's a great lens but I either needed below 70mm or I used my 85. The only real advantages I found over the 80-200 is a little faster/quieter focus and VR for hand holding at slower shutter speeds.

    I must say I'm surprised at the 100% option one. I had actually been leaning to option two. :redface: (and hoping others might think it made sense as well since it's $300-$500 cheaper. :frown:
     
  12. Commodorefirst

    Commodorefirst Admin/Moderator Administrator

    May 1, 2005
    Missouri
    You didn't mention price as a large concern, just a point in your original post, and you also mentioined nature and birds, which involves lower light focus sometimes and blurred backgrounds which comes with the 2.8 aperture, that is probably why all of us suggested the 70-200VR and 1.4. with that combo you get a faster long tele at 280mm vs 300mm, and better focusing in poor light.

    If money is a strong option than sure option II is a great bet and would give lots of bang for the buck.

    Cheers and good luck

    Wade
     
  13. davidzvi

    davidzvi

    Apr 30, 2005
    Massachusetts
    David
    Money is always a concern, but not the highest.
    But I almost didn't put nature and birds in my post as for most of those interests are mainly as a tourist on vacation and not as a serious pursuit. Builds and location type shots are more my interest on vacation, so my 17-55 has that covered anyway.
     
  14. Commodorefirst

    Commodorefirst Admin/Moderator Administrator

    May 1, 2005
    Missouri
    In that case option 2 is a great kit for you and the 30 1.4 will come in very very handy for your type of shooting.

    Cheers,

    Wade
     
  15. davidzvi

    davidzvi

    Apr 30, 2005
    Massachusetts
    David
    Well I have been able to sell both my 80-200 and 105 vr over the past week. And I have found great deals on both a Sigma 50-150 and 30 1.5.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.