1. Welcome to NikonCafe.com—a friendly Nikon camera & photography discussion forum!

    If you are thinking of buying a camera or need help with your photos, you will find our forum members full of advice! Click here to join for free!

Waterfall Photos

Discussion in 'Wanderlust and Travel' started by Takeda, Aug 12, 2009.

  1. Takeda

    Takeda

    Jun 9, 2006
    Durham, NC
    1
    617683793_VPbv8-X2.jpg
    Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


    2
    617684108_89dL6-X2.jpg
    Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


    3
    617684370_ZVwyr-X2.jpg
    Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


    4
    617684664_uJobi-X2.jpg
    Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


    5
    617684918_vE479-X2.jpg
    Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


    6
    617685359_Azhok-X2.jpg
    Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
     
  2. Very nice series...I'm a water shoot freak too.:biggrin:
     
  3. danameless

    danameless

    May 9, 2009
    NYC
    Very nice, too bad we don't have many waterfalls here in NYC.
     
  4. MMPG1

    MMPG1

    May 10, 2009
    Germany
    Very nice pictures! Thanks for posting.
     
  5. Spoogen_1

    Spoogen_1

    149
    May 3, 2009
    Longmont, CO
    Nice work
     
  6. whats the exif data on those? was a tripod used?
     
  7. Takeda

    Takeda

    Jun 9, 2006
    Durham, NC
    Yes, I used a tripod. Here is the EXIF data for #3:

    Make - NIKON CORPORATION
    Model - NIKON D300
    Orientation - Top left
    XResolution - 300
    YResolution - 300
    ResolutionUnit - Inch
    Software - Capture NX 2.2.0 W
    DateTime - 2009.08.12 00.57.54
    Artist -
    YCbCrPositioning - Centered
    ReferenceBlackWhite - 0
    Copyright -
    ExifOffset - 410
    ExposureTime - 1/2.5 seconds
    FNumber - 11
    ExposureProgram - Aperture priority
    ISOSpeedRatings - 200
    ExifVersion - 0220
    DateTimeOriginal - 2009.08.11 23.12.10
    DateTimeDigitized - 2009.08.11 23.12.10
    ComponentsConfiguration - YCbCr
    ExposureBiasValue - 0.00
    MaxApertureValue - F 2.83
    MeteringMode - Multi-segment
    LightSource - Auto
    Flash - Not fired
    FocalLength - 70 mm
    UserComment -
    SubsecTime - 86
    SubsecTimeOriginal - 86
    SubsecTimeDigitized - 86
    FlashPixVersion - 0100
    ColorSpace - sRGB
    ExifImageWidth - 2881
    ExifImageHeight - 2161
    SensingMethod - One-chip color area sensor
    FileSource - DSC - Digital still camera
    SceneType - A directly photographed image
    CustomRendered - Normal process
    ExposureMode - Auto
    White Balance - Auto
    DigitalZoomRatio - 1 x
    FocalLengthIn35mmFilm - 105 mm
    SceneCaptureType - Standard
    GainControl - None
    Contrast - Normal
    Saturation - Normal
    Sharpness - Hard
    SubjectDistanceRange - Unknown

    GPS information: -
    GPSVersionID - 2.2.0.0

    Maker Note (Vendor): -
    Data version - 0120 (808530480)
    ISO Setting - 200
    Image Quality - RAW
    White Balance - AUTO
    Focus Mode - AF-S
    White Balance Adjustment - 0
    White Balance RB - 644
    Exposure Adjustment - 786688
    Thumbnail IFD offset - 8582
    ISO 2 - 200
    Lens type - AF-D G
    Lens - 786
    Flash Used - Not fired
    Bracketing - 0
    Contrast Curve - I0
    Noise Reduction - OFF
    Total pictures - 16293
    Editor version - Capture NX 2.2.0 W

    Thumbnail: -
    Compression - 6 (JPG)
    XResolution - 300
    YResolution - 300
    ResolutionUnit - Inch
    JpegIFOffset - 9816
    JpegIFByteCount - 2681
     
  8. Nice shots! the only thing is, i dont like the shot through the plants on number 3. You get too distracted by them
     
  9. Jaytron

    Jaytron

    736
    Mar 22, 2009
    San Jose, CA
    Great set overall, but I also agree with Charlie, the plants kinda kill it for me.
     
  10. Takeda

    Takeda

    Jun 9, 2006
    Durham, NC

    Thank you for your post! I wanted to try and add a little color, and those plants were there. I tried to make them OOF, but it was difficult with the
    small aperture.....
     
  11. Jaytron

    Jaytron

    736
    Mar 22, 2009
    San Jose, CA
    Bob,

    It probably would have work better with a lens that had a larger aperture. But tbh they were a bit of overkill. A few too many branches. This is all just MHO it really matters if YOU like the shot :) 
     
  12. Takeda

    Takeda

    Jun 9, 2006
    Durham, NC

    Thanks Jay! I'm still learning & experimenting, and I really appreciate the critiques!
     
  13. Weston

    Weston

    674
    Dec 29, 2008
    Springfield, OR
    Nice photos! Lucky for me I live in oregon-lots of water falls!
     
  14. Jaytron

    Jaytron

    736
    Mar 22, 2009
    San Jose, CA
    No problem, glad I could help :biggrin:
     
  15. Very good photos....
    Elliot
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.