What UWA lens?

Which UWA lens?

  • Samyang/Vivitar 8mm f3.5 fisheye MF

    Votes: 1 1.7%
  • 10mm f2.8 dx Nikkor fisheye

    Votes: 6 10.0%
  • 10-24mm f3.5-4.5 dx Nikkor lens

    Votes: 17 28.3%
  • 11-16mm f2.8 dx Tokina lens

    Votes: 11 18.3%
  • 14mm f2.8 Nikkor lens

    Votes: 4 6.7%
  • 10-20mm Sigma f3.5 dx lens

    Votes: 9 15.0%
  • OTHER (please post which other one you would suggest)

    Votes: 12 20.0%

  • Total voters
    60
Joined
Feb 25, 2008
Messages
517
Location
Canada
So I have been working on my kit for while, and right now I have a 3 lens kit I will always be carrying... 30 1.4, 60 af-s, 85 1.4. What now I am missing is my UWA lens for this kit to complete it. what do you think is good to get?
 
T

TippCity

Guest
When shooting DX the 12-24mm performed very well.
The 12-24mm performed better above 14mm for my style shooting.

On FX the 14-24 is outstanding. I also used the 14-24mm on DX also with outstanding results.

When I want super wide, I go FX and the 14-24mm for my setup.

If I just need wide angle on DX, the 14-24mm is what I would prefer.
 
Joined
Jun 4, 2007
Messages
6,530
Location
Rockville, MD
I voted for the 14mm f/2.8 Nikkor, but I'm weird. :smile: It is a prime though, and you seem to like primes, and it works on full-frame if you ever get a D700 or shoot some film. My next choice would be the Nikon 10-24.
 
Joined
Mar 23, 2009
Messages
918
Location
nj/nyc
honestly, my uwa gets very little use but it's nice to have for when you need it.....


money no object/or planning on going FX= Nikon 14-24 2.8
on a budget=Tokina 12-24 f4
need for speed on a budget=Tokina 11-16 2.8
 
Joined
Jan 22, 2009
Messages
586
Location
London
First obvious choice: 14-24 nikon. (But you've probably left it out for obvious reasons.
2nd: Nikon 10-24 dx for your d300
3rd the 11-16 tokina 2.8
 
Joined
Feb 25, 2008
Messages
517
Location
Canada
wow alot of votes for the 10-20 sigma f3.5. Does anyone have some data on the quality of this lens?
If anyone can share some shots from these lens that would be great..

14mm 2.8
10-20 3.5 sigma
10-24 nikkor

thanks
 
Joined
Mar 23, 2008
Messages
3,125
Location
Santa Barbara, California, U.S.A.
I'm wondering if some of the folks who voted for the 10-20 3.5 actually meant the 10-20 4-5.6?

Why is the older, cheaper Sigma not on your list? It's still great bang for the buck.

Cheers

Mike
 
Joined
Jan 17, 2008
Messages
320
Location
Granite Bay, CA
I voted for the Nikkor 10-24, but would also recommend the Nikkor 12-24 f/4 (which I own and love), or either Sigma 10-20.

I originally bought a Tokina 12-24 and received a bad sample and just went with the Nikkor. I really like being able to go out to 24 mm as it provides the lens with a bit more flexibility for environmental portraits and the like.

The 14-24 is an awesome lens, and will obviously work on FX. That being said, for landscape work, I use a circular polarizer, along with Cokin Graduated ND filters and I'm not sure the 14-24 is compatible with any of these items.
 
Joined
Nov 13, 2008
Messages
774
Location
Austin, TX
I bought the Sigma 10-20. Head on over to the Sigma 10-20 thread here in the lens lust forum if you haven't had a chance. I had no problem picking my UWA after that, especially after looking at the price tag compared to some of the others.
 
Joined
Jun 4, 2007
Messages
6,530
Location
Rockville, MD
Who else voted for the 14/2.8? :confused: I thought I was the only one that liked this lens. Bugger! :biggrin:

Here's some samples. I really need to dump these into a new tribute style thread. Maybe I will.


F100 + Velvia 50
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)



D200
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)



Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)



Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)



F100 and Fuji Reala 100
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)



Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)





There's different flavors and styles of ultra-wide photography. Mine is more along the lines of getting right on top of something and exaggerating perspective, so I find this lens to be very well suited for what I like to do since it focuses closer than any other rectilinear ultra-wide lens that I know of at 0.2m close focus. Most others are in the 0.25 to 0.3m range which is actually a huge difference. About as huge as going from 14mm to 10mm on DX. For a more general purpose landscape/scenic style lens, something with a zoom would be a bit more versatile. For that I'd choose the Nikon 10-24 which gives you some nice range, but still focuses pretty closely. A co-worker picked one of these up so I'll have to see if I can borrow it sometime.
 
Joined
Jun 4, 2007
Messages
6,530
Location
Rockville, MD
Here's a collage of shots I put together for when I sold my 11-16. Great lens, but I found that I actually tried to avoid using the lens due to the limited range. It was annoying having to swap lenses just for one shot, and then immediately wanted to get back out into the 18-24mm range again. I didn't like how far away the close focus was. And I found that I usually preferred to stop down to f/4 for additional depth of field on a lot of my photos and got better results that way as opposed to shooting wide-open at f/2.8. So not a good match for me, but I did have fun with it and found it a good new home. :smile: For a DX ultra-wide zoom, I'd definitely prefer a 12-24 or 10-24 type of lens.

Tokina 11-16 samples:

 
Joined
Mar 23, 2009
Messages
593
Location
Nevada
I have a old Simga 14mm f3.5. I think its a great lens and I only paid $250 for it used.
 
Joined
Jun 4, 2007
Messages
6,530
Location
Rockville, MD
Just for fun, this is my favorite Nikon 10.5mm f/2.8 DX fisheye shot of all time. From the balcony of a friend's high-rise condo in Chicago. Converted with the Image Trends Hemi plug-in.

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


I think just about all of the lenses you had listed are good, so it's just a matter of finding the one that would most closely match your own personal style and flavor of ultra-wide photography.
 
Joined
Feb 25, 2008
Messages
517
Location
Canada
Steve, Ed,

When you convert the 10.5 fisheye, what do you end up with? As in how wide is the shot compared in focal length as in UWA length?
 

Latest posts

Links on this page may be to our affiliates. Sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
Nikon Cafe is a fan site and not associated with Nikon Corporation.
Forum post reactions by Twemoji: https://github.com/twitter/twemoji
Copyright © 2005-2019 Amin Forums, LLC
Top Bottom