Which Sigma Primes?

Joined
Jul 25, 2007
Messages
853
Location
Europe
Hi,

I've noticed around Flickr (hope that's not a bad word here) that some photographers whose work I really admire use sigma primes for some of their work. I am only familiar with the 30mm f/1.4. If you have used any Sigma primes, I'd be very interested to hear your experience not just solely evaluating the lens (optical performance) on its own, but also in comparison to the closest Nikon prime equivalent?

Thank you!
Kristina
 
Joined
Apr 22, 2006
Messages
894
Location
Talladega, Al
I have the 150 macro lens. It is as sharp as any nikon lens I have ever used. Its not just for macro. It works well as a medium telephoto too.
I had a 50 2.8 sigma that was sharp. I don't remember what the bokeh on it was like though.
 
Joined
May 11, 2006
Messages
1,002
Location
CHARLOTTE
Real Name
Randy
a 2nd vote for the 150 2.8

329312433_xhi2p-XL.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2008
Messages
316
Location
Finland
All Sigma macro lenses are known to be very sharp. My personal favorite is Bugzilla (150/2.8 macro). Also, new 50/1.4 seems to be of high quality.
 
Joined
Jul 20, 2007
Messages
4,047
Location
UK
The Sigma 150mm is known as being a great lens, for both macro and a short tele.

However if that's out of your budget I can 100% reccomend the smaller 105mm Macro.
 
Joined
Jul 25, 2007
Messages
853
Location
Europe
Right now I haven't really formulated a budget. I was looking primarily at their wider angle lenses, but it's good to know which lenses are high performers, regardless of focal length because who knows when you may need a new lens!!!
 
Joined
Sep 4, 2007
Messages
4,265
Location
Perivale, West London
Real Name
John A Alexander
Another vote for the Sigma 150 2.8

2704023873_610ca05594_b.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


The 120-300 2.8 is pretty good too!

2703453813_14007ef271_b.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
 
Joined
Mar 23, 2007
Messages
4,977
Location
Collecchio, northern Italy
From Photozone...

kit.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


Since you're looking for a general advice, I'd say that DESPITE the excellent optical qualities, that lens it the only one I'd get from the Sigma lineup actually. It works extremely well as in macro as for a middle telephoto. About wide angles.. well.. on a DX format it's difficult to find something really "prime" and "wide".
I can't really think of other Sigma lenses, actually.
 
Joined
Nov 26, 2007
Messages
5,364
Location
Austin
Yes, the 30mm 1.4 is a spectacular choice, but if you want to go wide, then I suggest the 20mm 1.8 :smile:
 
Joined
Jul 8, 2007
Messages
1,293
Location
East Tennessee USA
Sigma 28mm EX DG @ 1.8.

This lens is pretty good wide open and focuses very close. It is also not a DX lens.

2704734343_d4c02698f8_b.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
 
Joined
Apr 6, 2006
Messages
278
Location
Albany OR
Two I love the 150 macro 2.8 and the 20mm 1.8. Priced well and fun. I really like 28mm on full frame so the 20mm is close to that. The 150 is just sweet,
original.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


20mm 1.8 sigi
original.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
 
Joined
Jan 4, 2008
Messages
3,400
Location
New York City
I just got the 20mm f/1.8. It's a big lens (has 82mm threads). My jury is out on this lens. I'm having trouble geting sharp images wide open, which makes me wonder what it has over the nikon 20mm f/2.8. Stopped down down, though, it's a nice optic. I just posted some images I took with this lens in the Landscapes Picture Gallery.

Here's one at f/1.8:

2678596628_a1feeb4762_b.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


According to this Pop Photo review, the 24mm f/1.8 is the best of their three fast wides.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Latest threads

Top Bottom