- Joined
- Nov 3, 2018
- Messages
- 117
Same focal range. Same megapixels. Smaller, lighter form factor.I guess I don't get the point of this conversation?????![]()
Only thing stopping them is consumer perception. Hopefully with the warm reception of the f/4 zooms that can change and well see more retractable Z options. A retractable 70-300 would be nice.A fairer comparison would be with the Nikon 24-85mm VR lens versus the 24-70mm f/4 S already extended. There's nothing stopping Nikon from making retractable F-mount FX lenses, like they do with their DX kit lens designs. Honestly, where mirrorless shows it's strengths are with reasonable sized wide angles.
I'd like to see a few more AF-P FX lenses released before going all Z-mount. It'll smooth out the transition from F to Z. Also we won't really see the potential of the Z mount until faster glass in both the wide and telephoto end are released. What I do miss though are small compact 2.8 primes. Makes me want to just get a Df, so I can slap on all the AF-D prime lenses!Only thing stopping them is consumer perception. Hopefully with the warm reception of the f/4 zooms that can change and well see more retractable Z options. A retractable 70-300 would be nice.
No disagreement, but a nice retractable 70-200 or 70-300 would be a great small FX kit. While I would prefer a 70-300 range, a constant f/4 70-200 retractable might be small enough for the body and three lenses to all fit into something like the ONA Bowery, that would be nice.I'd like to see a few more AF-P FX lenses released before going all Z-mount. It'll smooth out the transition from F to Z. Also we won't really see the potential of the Z mount until faster glass in both the wide and telephoto end are released. What I do miss though are small compact 2.8 primes. Makes me want to just get a Df, so I can slap on all the AF-D prime lenses!