Some on the Olympus forum are bitching that the EM5-mk3 is too expensive.
I don't remember anyone on a photo forum ever praising the price of a newly released camera.
Some on the Olympus forum are bitching that the EM5-mk3 is too expensive.
I guess Olympus are trying to make some coin before offering cashbacks and discounts to try and move stock.
changing lenses is a good point. I'll most likely only own 1 native lens (the kit lens)No auto sensor clean will not put me off I don't think, the auto sensor clean is only a let's move some dust about in the hope it falls off the sensor for now. As far as I understand it the Rocket blower will do just as good if not a better job, that's hardly the same as having to wet clean.
Also, I don't change lenses when ime out and about, I decide what ime after and just take that lens out on the camera, I know dust can still get in but not that much.
As Nikon's entry model and given the feature set, isn't the Z50 more comparable (at least in marketing positioning) to the Oly OM-D EM10? The EM10 is a couple of hundred bucks cheaper.
Understood. The sensor is the primary reason I moved on from m4/3. I was just looking at the relative positions of the Z50 and the EM10 in their manufacturers' line ups. And, FWIW, the EM10 has 5-axis IBIS and is two hundred dollars cheaper. I think the Z50 will likely be a very nice camera. I also think it will be interesting to watch how it does in the marketplace and how Nikon's APS-C mirrorless gambit plays out.Of course the Z50 has a significantly larger sensor than µ4/3 so theoretically should have better signal-to-noise ratio.
Of course the Z50 has a significantly larger sensor than µ4/3 so theoretically should have better signal-to-noise ratio.
Stabilized sensor meaning every lens is stabilized, 1/8000 mechanical shutter and 1/32000 electronic shutter, 80MP high resolution images, 30fps with pre-burst capture, Live Bulb for active sensor readout during long exposures. I could go on.Higher price tag for smaller sensor? No thanks
Small sensor and yet still not pocketable.
No auto sensor clean will not put me off I don't think, the auto sensor clean is only a let's move some dust about in the hope it falls off the sensor for now. As far as I understand it the Rocket blower will do just as good if not a better job, that's hardly the same as having to wet clean.
Also, I don't change lenses when ime out and about, I decide what ime after and just take that lens out on the camera, I know dust can still get in but not that much.
I've never known a Joe Average that ever questioned whether his sensor was clean. Hardly a deal breaker for Joe Average in my mind.
My experience with a D500 is that the sensor clean works very well indeed. I’d really not want to carry a blower around and clean the sensor in the field, or risk a sequence of shots with dust. I do macro, with small apertures, so dust is a real problem. My D600, which does not have the dust magnet issue that affected earlier ones, does collect dust.
The auto sensor clean can only move dust and debris, i agree it does a great job but as i say i don't change lenses when ime out so in my situation i feel sure a rocket blower will do just as well.
Could you explain what you mean when you say it can only move dust and debris. Yes for you a blower would be fine.
Its my understanding it cants remove anything that requires a wet clean.
Its confusing me, just taken this grab from a Nikon video, it states 11fps in silent, that to me means E shutter, its the one thing that could make it a no for me