Does Nikon have the horsepower to push 24mp files thru at 8fps ?
Is the D7100 the best they can do now and is that why we haven't seen a 24mp high fps DX body
I am sure they do, especially with DX, but I don't think they have the desire to make this move. This would mean introducing a DX pro body, and we know the likelihood of that happening.
who else has shown they can do this ?
Personally I think they are short on horsepower and threw the d7100 out there while they work on a bigger processor or a dualy
I can't honestly answer that, but I will say I suspect they do have the technology. The D4, while 16MP, has a decent frame rate. And if the D4s is going to be 24MPs than it surely is possible to do a what you are asking, build a DX screamer. The real question should be is Nikon ever going to introduce a DX pro body? If yes, you will get 24MP @ 10fps. My gut feeling is we will never se a DX pro body from Nikon. Just saying.
i doubt the d4s will be 24 and 24 mp dx means the sensor is around 58mps or does it, not being very technical with sensor technology I wonder what that means for the processor. I know those huge D800 files don't move to the card very fast
I think a lot of it has to do with image content and compression, if used. On my D800 I shoot 14-Bit Uncompressed + Optimal Quality on JPG. There's a lot of data in the D800 files and it changes on the amount and complexity of the color content . I personally don't think processor power is the limiting factor with the D800, I suspect buffer size. Memory is cheap these days and I think Nikon can build a screamer if they add more memory. I/O is a killer here. This means faster memory for buffer and faster and larger memory cards.
Also, it all depends on how the processing algorithms are written. I found this out the hard way pushing CNX2 as it was continually accessing the disk and bottle-necking. Put that SSD in and it is amazingly fast now. So, from a hardware perspective, I suspect they can do it.
Do you really want a DX pro body?
i would love a dx pro body but that won't happen (by pro i mean with a builtin grip).....I'd be happy with a 24mp 8fps dx body that has d300 like AF and a decent size buffer, basically all the things the d7100 doesn't have except the 24mp sensor
Yep, my definition of a pro body as well. It's too bad they didn't continue the D2x like, that was a nice camera. I don't expect Nikon to go with the specs you want in a prosumer model, the interest is surely there.![]()
Does Nikon have the horsepower to push 24mp files thru at 8fps ?
Is the D7100 the best they can do now and is that why we haven't seen a 24mp high fps DX body
I think that is exactly why we don't have a "D400" 24 MP is 50% more than the 16 MP of the D4, that is a considerable jump IMO.
who else has shown they can do this ?
Personally I think they are short on horsepower and threw the d7100 out there while they work on a bigger processor or a dualy
A D800S with Expeed 4 would make a lot of sense - I think that's where Nikon is going. Keep the sensor roughly the same (small refinements to noise/processing, possibly drop the antialiasing filter altogether ala the D7100). Bump up the frame rate and buffer. If they could unleash a camera that got say 5/6fps in FX/38mp mode, 7/8fps in the 25mp 1.2x crop (killer for sports), and 8/9fps in DX mode (BIF mode), it would solve problems for a lot of shooters. D700 replacement and D400 dreamers would rejoice. The D4S/Df would still have the edge in speed/workflow and style/lowlight performance, but for everyone else the camera above would make one helluva swiss army knife.